فکر بنیانبانک مقالات روان‌شناسی
دسترسی آزاد پژوهشی داوری‌شده انگلیسی

A Comparison of Suicidal Behaviors Among Middle and High School Students in Two Municipalities in Hidalgo, Mexico

Melanie Denise Díaz de la Torre, Jesús Guadalupe Pérez‐Flores, Tania Flores-Bazán, Amayrani Hatziri Ortega Licona, José Antonio Guerrero-Solano

Ciencia y reflexión : 2026 Vol. 5(4), pp. 228-249
https://doi.org/10.70747/cr.v5i4.1408

متن کامل این مقاله در فکر بنیان نیست؛ مشخصات و چکیده را می‌بینید و متن کامل را می‌توانید از طریق DOI در سایت ناشر بخوانید. صفحه‌ی مقاله در سایت ناشر ↗

چکیده

Introduction: Suicidal behaviors among adolescents are increasing globally, yet the differences between educational levels remain unclear, which hinders the design of specific prevention strategies. Objective: To compare suicidal behaviors (ideation, risk factors, and depression) between middle school and high school students in Pachuca and San Agustín Tlaxiaca, Hidalgo, Mexico. Methodology: A quantitative, cross-sectional, comparative, non-experimental study was conducted with 38 students (20 middle school students, 18 high school students) aged 14 to 18 years. Three instruments were applied: a test to assess the risk level of suicidal ideation and behavior, a risk factor guide, and the PHQ-9 depression questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Middle school students had a higher proportion of high risk for suicidal behaviors (30.00%) compared to high school students (5.56%). A high level of depression was found only in high school seniors (11.11%). Both groups showed similar proportions of high risk based on risk factors (25.00% in middle school and 22.22% in high school). A significant positive correlation (ρ = 0.52) was found between suicidal thoughts and risk factors (p < 0.05). The Mann-Whitney U test revealed no significant differences between groups. (U = 145.5; p = 0.312). Conclusions: Although no statistically significant differences were found between educational levels and the groups were confounded by institution, municipality, and age, a trend toward a higher proportion of high risk for suicidal behaviors was observed in middle school students and of high depression in high school students. These findings should be interpreted with caution and support the need for prevention programs tailored to each educational level, to be confirmed in studies with greater statistical power and adjustment for confounders.

موضوع‌ها و کلیدواژه‌ها

افسردگیخودکشینوجوانیافکار خودکشیSuicide preventionhigh school studentsjunior high school studentssuicidal behaviorsuicide risk factorsنوجوانان

ارجاع

Torre, M. D. D. D. L., Pérez‐Flores, J. G., Flores-Bazán, T., Licona, A. H. O., & Guerrero-Solano, J. A. (2026). A Comparison of Suicidal Behaviors Among Middle and High School Students in Two Municipalities in Hidalgo, Mexico. Ciencia y reflexión :, 5(4), 228–249. https://doi.org/10.70747/cr.v5i4.1408

(Torre et al., 2026)

دانلود BibTeX · دانلود RIS

گفت‌وگو

قوانین پرسش و گفتگو
  1. با احترام و بدون توهین، تحقیر، برچسب‌زنی یا حمله‌ی شخصی با دیگران گفتگو کنید.
  2. از نوشتن هرگونه اطلاعات هویتی یا قابل‌شناسایی مراجعان، بیماران یا اشخاص ثالث، از جمله نام، شماره‌ی تماس، تصویر، نشانی، محل کار یا جزئیات منحصربه‌فرد پرونده خودداری کنید.
  3. اگر درباره‌ی یک تجربه‌ی بالینی سؤال می‌کنید، اطلاعات را تا حد ممکن بی‌نام و کلی بیان کنید تا امکان شناسایی فرد وجود نداشته باشد.
  4. این بخش برای یادگیری و گفت‌وگوی علمی است و جایگزین ارزیابی، تشخیص، مشاوره یا روان‌درمانی شخصی نیست.
  5. در شرایط بحران یا خطر آسیب به خود یا دیگران، به این بخش اتکا نکنید و برای دریافت کمک فوری با اورژانس اجتماعی ۱۲۳ یا صدای مشاور بهزیستی ۱۴۸۰ تماس بگیرید.
  6. انتشار تبلیغات، معرفی خدمات شخصی، شماره‌ی تلفن، شناسه‌ی شبکه‌های اجتماعی، پیوند تبلیغاتی یا درخواست جذب مراجع در این بخش مجاز نیست.
  7. در بیان ادعاهای علمی، به‌ویژه درباره‌ی اثربخشی درمان‌ها، تشخیص یا یافته‌های پژوهشی، تا حد امکان نام منبع معتبر، مقاله یا راهنمای علمی را ذکر کنید.
  8. از ارائه‌ی تشخیص قطعی، تجویز درمان یا دارو و توصیه‌های بالینی شخصی به سایر کاربران خودداری کنید.
  9. پاسخ‌هایی که کارشناسان فکر بنیان می‌دهند با برچسب «پاسخ فکر بنیان» یا «کارشناس فکر بنیان» نمایش داده می‌شوند و سایر نوشته‌ها بیانگر نظر کاربران هستند.
  10. گزارش نوشته‌ی نامناسب: اگر نوشته‌ای حاوی نقض محرمانگی، محتوای آسیب‌زا، توهین، تبلیغ یا تخلف از این قوانین است، گزینه‌ی «گزارش» را انتخاب کنید تا تیم سایت بررسی کند.

برای پرسیدن و پاسخ دادن باید مشترک باشید. ورود

هنوز پرسشی منتشر نشده است.

مقاله‌های مرتبط

Pendampingan Pembelajaran Al-Islam dan Kemuhammadiyahan bagi Remaja Yayasan Cahaya Ilmu di Dusun Lawang Kuta

Anugrah Giffari; Dina Mardiana Indonesia Berdampak: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 2026 https://doi.org/10.63822/btzdym10

چکیده

Yayasan Cahaya Ilmu is a social and religious institution in Lawang Kuta Hamlet, Lembar Village, West Lombok Regency, that fosters 11 adolescent and young adult beneficiaries aged 13–18 years with orphan, double-orphan, and underprivileged family backgrounds. Prior to this program, the beneficiaries had not received structured mentoring in Al-Islam and Kemuhammadiyahan (AIK), consistent with national data indicating high school dropout rates in West Nusa Tenggara. This community service program aimed to improve participants' understanding of Islamic values, cultivate knowledge of Muhammadiyah's ideology, and build noble character and independence. The method adapted a Participatory Action Research approach, implemented over one month through eight scheduled visits (twice weekly), combined with independent daily worship habituation supervised by the foundation's mentor. Results showed improvement across all indicators: the average AIK comprehension score increased from 50.5 to 80.6 (scale of 100); 91% of participants were able to perform prayer according to fiqh standards; 91% showed improvement in Qur'anic recitation quality using the tahsin method and 100% of participants successfully memorized five short surahs. Outputs produced include a two-volume AIK module, Qur'anic storyboards, daily worship monitoring tables, and the establishment of an independent study circle (halaqah mandiri) as a form of program sustainability.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد

Interaction between self-efficacy and coach expectation pressure on adolescent athletes’ performance

Avry Ramadhan Bastian; Rizky Putra Santosa Cognicia, 2026, Vol. 14, Issue 2, pp. 130-136 https://doi.org/10.22219/cognicia.v14i2.46471

چکیده

This study aimed to examine the role of self-efficacy and pressure of coach expectations in predicting the performance of adolescent athletes. This study used a cross-sectional survey design involving 142 athletes aged 16–19 years from regional and national sports clubs. Data analysis included Pearson correlation test, independent-samples t-test, and multiple linear regression. The results showed that self-efficacy was positively and significantly associated with athlete performance, while coach expectation pressure was negatively and significantly related to athlete performance. In addition, there were differences in performance by gender, with male athletes reporting higher performance scores than female athletes. When gender was included as a control variable in the regression model, self-efficacy and coach expectations pressure remained significant predictors of athlete performance. Overall, these findings suggest that internal psychological factors and pressures from the sports environment play a role in explaining variations in adolescent athlete performance. This study emphasizes the importance of strengthening self-efficacy and the application of realistic and supportive expectations of coaches in the process of coaching athletes. Further longitudinal research is needed to examine this relationship in more depth.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد

Interpersonal Stressors and Adolescent Mental Health During COVID-19: Investigating the Role of Loneliness

Atina Manvelian; Erica Marie Szkody; Katherine A Cohen; Jessica Lee Schleider Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 2026 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-026-02113-4

چکیده

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic created social disruptions, leading to high levels of mental health problems for adolescents. Interpersonal stressors, such as lack of familial support, peer victimization, and discrimination, may have further exacerbated teen mental health issues. Yet, the psychological impact of interpersonal stressors and their interactive effects with high levels of loneliness remains unknown. In this pre-registered study , conducted in November and December 2020 (approximately eight months into the COVID-19 pandemic), we used a diverse sample of adolescents from across 43 U.S. states with elevated depressive symptoms (n = 2,452, ages 13–16) to examine how familial support, peer victimization, and discrimination are concurrently associated with mental health outcomes. Results indicated that perceived discrimination was the strongest standardized correlate across continuous internalizing outcomes (depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and hopelessness), whereas lack of familial support was the primary correlate of suicidal ideation; if youth reported a lack of familial support, they were over three times as likely to report suicidal ideation. Loneliness significantly moderated the cross-sectional links between lack of familial support and depressive symptoms, as well as perceived discrimination and hopelessness. Simple slope probing demonstrated a distress ceiling effect: interpersonal stressors were most strongly associated with elevated distress among youth reporting low baseline loneliness, whereas youth experiencing high loneliness exhibited consistently elevated distress regardless of stressor exposure. These findings underscore interpersonal stressors and loneliness as high-priority targets for youth prevention and intervention programs, particularly during periods of widespread social disruption.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد

Parentification, Perceived Stress, and Disruptive Behavior in Adolescents

Shabeena Nadeen; Anum Rabbani; Iqra Saeed International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries Social Science, 2026, Vol. 5, Issue 6, pp. 104-127 https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemd-ss.2026.05.6.883

چکیده

The purpose of this study is to examine how parentification and perceived stress impact adolescents' psychological and behavioural adjustment. This study explored the associations between parentification, perceived stress, and disruptive behaviour, and the predictive and mediating effects of these variables. The method of the research was descriptive cross sectional, purposive sampling was used for gathering samples, the number of samples obtained was 250.The methods used were descriptive cross sectional design, purposive sampling was used for sampling. The Parentification Inventory, Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and Disruptive Behaviour Scale were used to collect the data. The SPSS Version 26 was used for descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, regression analysis and Hayes’ PROCESS Macro (Model 4). Results showed that parentification was not a significant predictor of perceived stress and disruptive behaviour. Perceived stress, however, was a strong predictor of disruptive behaviour. Indirect effect of parentification on disruptive behaviour via perceived stress was also non-significant. Impression of stress seems to be a key factor related to disruptive behaviour among adolescents, while the impact of parentification could differ based on contextual and cultural factors. The results emphasize the need for stress reduction and psychological health promotion initiatives for youth in Pakistan.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد