Background Diabetes self-management requires consistent daily behaviors. Social jetlag, the mismatch between workday and free-day sleep timing, may disrupt daily behavior routines. This study examined the association between social jetlag and self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), and whether sleep quality and depressive symptoms statistically accounted for portions of this association. Methods This cross-sectional study recruited employed adults aged 18–60 years with T2D from the endocrinology departments of three tertiary public general hospitals in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China, from January to April 2026. Social jetlag was calculated from the micro Munich Chronotype Questionnaire; sleep quality, depressive symptoms, and diabetes self-management were assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities, respectively. Multivariable linear regression and serial mediation analysis with 5,000 bootstrap resamples were performed. Results A total of 339 participants were analyzed. Each additional h of social jetlag was associated with higher PSQI score ( B = 1.352, 95% CI 1.042 to 1.663), higher PHQ-9 score ( B = 3.772, 95% CI 3.314 to 4.229), and lower SDSCA score ( B = −6.623, 95% CI −7.566 to −5.679). The direct association remained significant after PSQI and PHQ-9 scores were included ( B = −3.830, 95% CI −5.048 to −2.611). The specific indirect association through depressive symptoms alone was −2.230 (95% bootstrap CI −3.053 to −1.469), and the serial indirect association through sleep quality and depressive symptoms was −0.314 (95% bootstrap CI −0.534 to −0.150). Conclusion Greater social jetlag was associated with poorer diabetes self-management. Significant indirect associations were observed through depressive symptoms alone and through the serial pathway from sleep quality to depressive symptoms. These associations do not establish temporal ordering or causal mediation because the data were cross-sectional.
چکیده به فارسی
زمینه و هدف: خودمدیریتی دیابت نیازمند رفتارهای روزانه منظم است. جتلگ اجتماعی، که به عدم تطابق زمان خواب در روزهای کاری و تعطیل اشاره دارد، ممکن است روالهای رفتاری روزانه را مختل کند. این مطالعه ارتباط بین جتلگ اجتماعی و خودمدیریتی در بزرگسالان مبتلا به دیابت نوع ۲ (T2D) و همچنین نقش کیفیت خواب و علائم افسردگی به عنوان عوامل تبیینکننده بخشی از این ارتباط را بررسی کرد. روشها: این مطالعه مقطعی، بزرگسالان شاغل ۱۸ تا ۶۰ ساله مبتلا به T2D را از بخشهای غدد سه بیمارستان عمومی سطح سوم در منطقه خودمختار نینگشیا هوی، چین، از ژانویه تا آوریل ۲۰۲۶ جذب کرد. جتلگ اجتماعی با استفاده از پرسشنامه Micro Munich Chronotype Questionnaire محاسبه شد؛ کیفیت خواب، علائم افسردگی و خودمدیریتی دیابت بهترتیب با شاخص کیفیت خواب پیتسبورگ، پرسشنامه سلامت بیمار-۹ (PHQ-9) و خلاصه فعالیتهای مراقبت از دیابت (SDSCA) ارزیابی شدند. رگرسیون خطی چندمتغیره و تحلیل میانجیگری زنجیرهای با ۵۰۰۰ بازنمونهگیری بوتاسترپ انجام شد. یافتهها: مجموعاً ۳۳۹ شرکتکننده مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند. هر ساعت افزایش جتلگ اجتماعی با نمره بالاتر PSQI (B = 1.352، فاصله اطمینان ۹۵٪: 1.042 تا 1.663)، نمره بالاتر PHQ-9 (B = 3.772، فاصله اطمینان ۹۵٪: 3.314 تا 4.229) و نمره پایینتر SDSCA (B = −6.623، فاصله اطمینان ۹۵٪: −7.566 تا −5.679) همراه بود. ارتباط مستقیم پس از وارد کردن نمرات PSQI و PHQ-9 همچنان معنادار باقی ماند (B = −3.830، فاصله اطمینان ۹۵٪: −5.048 تا −2.611). ارتباط غیرمستقیم خاص از طریق علائم افسردگی به تنهایی برابر با −2.230 (فاصله اطمینان بوتاسترپ ۹۵٪: −3.053 تا −1.469) و ارتباط غیرمستقیم زنجیرهای از طریق کیفیت خواب و علائم افسردگی برابر با −0.314 (فاصله اطمینان بوتاسترپ ۹۵٪: −0.534 تا −0.150) بود. نتیجهگیری: جتلگ اجتماعی بیشتر با خودمدیریتی ضعیفتر دیابت همراه بود. ارتباطات غیرمستقیم معناداری از طریق علائم افسردگی به تنهایی و همچنین از طریق مسیر زنجیرهای کیفیت خواب تا علائم افسردگی مشاهده شد. این ارتباطات به دلیل مقطعی بودن دادهها، ترتیب زمانی یا میانجیگری علّی را اثبات نمیکنند.
ترجمهی خودکار برای آشنایی سریع؛ برای نقل و ارجاع، متن اصلی ملاک است.
He, J., Wang, S., Zhang, J., Li, S., Huang, X., Chongmei, H., & Liu, M. (2026). Association between social jetlag and diabetes self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study with serial mediation analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1979499
با احترام و بدون توهین، تحقیر، برچسبزنی یا حملهی شخصی با دیگران گفتگو کنید.
از نوشتن هرگونه اطلاعات هویتی یا قابلشناسایی مراجعان، بیماران یا اشخاص ثالث، از جمله نام، شمارهی تماس، تصویر، نشانی، محل کار یا جزئیات منحصربهفرد پرونده خودداری کنید.
اگر دربارهی یک تجربهی بالینی سؤال میکنید، اطلاعات را تا حد ممکن بینام و کلی بیان کنید تا امکان شناسایی فرد وجود نداشته باشد.
این بخش برای یادگیری و گفتوگوی علمی است و جایگزین ارزیابی، تشخیص، مشاوره یا رواندرمانی شخصی نیست.
در شرایط بحران یا خطر آسیب به خود یا دیگران، به این بخش اتکا نکنید و برای دریافت کمک فوری با اورژانس اجتماعی ۱۲۳ یا صدای مشاور بهزیستی ۱۴۸۰ تماس بگیرید.
انتشار تبلیغات، معرفی خدمات شخصی، شمارهی تلفن، شناسهی شبکههای اجتماعی، پیوند تبلیغاتی یا درخواست جذب مراجع در این بخش مجاز نیست.
در بیان ادعاهای علمی، بهویژه دربارهی اثربخشی درمانها، تشخیص یا یافتههای پژوهشی، تا حد امکان نام منبع معتبر، مقاله یا راهنمای علمی را ذکر کنید.
از ارائهی تشخیص قطعی، تجویز درمان یا دارو و توصیههای بالینی شخصی به سایر کاربران خودداری کنید.
پاسخهایی که کارشناسان فکر بنیان میدهند با برچسب «پاسخ فکر بنیان» یا «کارشناس فکر بنیان» نمایش داده میشوند و سایر نوشتهها بیانگر نظر کاربران هستند.
گزارش نوشتهی نامناسب: اگر نوشتهای حاوی نقض محرمانگی، محتوای آسیبزا، توهین، تبلیغ یا تخلف از این قوانین است، گزینهی «گزارش» را انتخاب کنید تا تیم سایت بررسی کند.
Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic created social disruptions, leading to high levels of mental health problems for adolescents. Interpersonal stressors, such as lack of familial support, peer victimization, and discrimination, may have further exacerbated teen mental health issues. Yet, the psychological impact of interpersonal stressors and their interactive effects with high levels of loneliness remains unknown. In this pre-registered study , conducted in November and December 2020 (approximately eight months into the COVID-19 pandemic), we used a diverse sample of adolescents from across 43 U.S. states with elevated depressive symptoms (n = 2,452, ages 13–16) to examine how familial support, peer victimization, and discrimination are concurrently associated with mental health outcomes. Results indicated that perceived discrimination was the strongest standardized correlate across continuous internalizing outcomes (depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and hopelessness), whereas lack of familial support was the primary correlate of suicidal ideation; if youth reported a lack of familial support, they were over three times as likely to report suicidal ideation. Loneliness significantly moderated the cross-sectional links between lack of familial support and depressive symptoms, as well as perceived discrimination and hopelessness. Simple slope probing demonstrated a distress ceiling effect: interpersonal stressors were most strongly associated with elevated distress among youth reporting low baseline loneliness, whereas youth experiencing high loneliness exhibited consistently elevated distress regardless of stressor exposure. These findings underscore interpersonal stressors and loneliness as high-priority targets for youth prevention and intervention programs, particularly during periods of widespread social disruption.
Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the internalised stigma and self-esteem in adult outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) attending a psychiatric outpatient clinic in Iraq, and to explore the relationship between these variables. Methods: A cross-sectional correlational study among 120 adults with MDD who attended psychiatric outpatient clinics of Azadi Teaching Hospital in Kirkuk, Iraq. All participants filled out a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire, the Internalised Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI), and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficient and simple linear regression. Results: The overall mean ISMI score was 2.90 (SD = 0.42), with the highest scores for stereotype endorsement (M = 3.16) and alienation (M = 3.14) and the lowest for stigma resistance (M = 2.19). The overall mean RSES score was 2.29 (SD = 0.38). There was a negative correlation between internalised stigma and self-esteem (r = −0.338, p < 0.001). Self-esteem was statistically associated with internalised stigma (β = −0.338, t = −3.897, p < 0.001), explaining 11.4% of the variance (R² = 0.114) in simple linear regression. Conclusions: In this single-centre sample of adults with MDD, internalised stigma and self-esteem were inversely related. Since the study is a cross-sectional design, the association observed cannot be considered a causal relationship. The results provide a basis for consideration of the psychosocial aspects of routine psychiatric care (stigma and self-esteem) and for further longitudinal and multicentre research to establish temporal relationships and to determine potentially modifiable factors.
University students who live away from their families may experience loneliness and depressive symptoms, while perceived social support may alter this relationship. This study examined the associations among loneliness, perceived social support, and depressive symptoms and tested whether perceived social support moderated the loneliness-depressive symptoms relationship. A cross-sectional quantitative design involved 396 university students living in boarding houses in Yogyakarta. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlations and moderated multiple regression. Perceived social support was negatively associated with depressive symptoms. Loneliness was also significantly associated with depressive symptoms, but the direction was negative and therefore did not support the proposed positive hypothesis. The interaction between loneliness and perceived social support was significant, indicating that the loneliness slope differed across levels of support. The findings highlight the relevance of perceived social support for student mental health while also showing that the unexpected loneliness pattern requires cautious interpretation and replication.
Abstract Background Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) is a transdiagnostic process relevant to common mental health problems in primary care. RNT-ACT is a brief acceptance and commitment therapy-based protocol targeting RNT in two sessions. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of RNT-ACT compared with therapist-supported internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) in Swedish primary care. Methods Thirteen participants were randomised: 7 to RNT-ACT and 6 to iCBT. The primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate, intervention non-completion, and patient satisfaction measured with the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Symptom and process measures were secondary outcomes. Secondary outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 1- and 3-month follow-ups. Analyses were descriptive and exploratory, based on available observations without imputation of missing data. Results Thirteen of 20 eligible individuals were enrolled (65%), corresponding to 35% of all 37 individuals screened. All participants in the RNT-ACT group completed the intervention, whereas 4 of 6 participants in the iCBT group did not complete the intervention. Mean CSQ-8 scores were 27.8 (SD 3.7; n = 5) in the RNT-ACT group and 23.0 (SD 0.0; n = 2) in the iCBT group. Conclusions The small sample size and high iCBT non-completion limit between-group comparisons. Further investigation of recruitment, treatment engagement, and patient and therapist experiences is needed before determining whether and how to proceed to a full-scale RCT. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05946382 registered July 14, 2023.
The present study investigated the predictive role of trait mindfulness in relation to depression, anxiety, and stress among Pakistani young adults. The following hypotheses were formulated: H1: Trait mindfulness will significantly and negatively predict depression among Pakistani young adults. H2: Trait mindfulness will significantly and negatively predict anxiety among Pakistani young adults. H3: Trait mindfulness will significantly and negatively predict stress among Pakistani young adults. A sample of 405 participants (189 males, 216 females; aged 18–30 years, M = 22.39, SD = 2.823) completed an online survey including the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). Reliability and normality assessments confirmed the adequacy of the measures. Linear regression analyses revealed that trait mindfulness significantly and negatively predicted depression (R² = .237, p < .001), anxiety (R² = .210, p < .001), and stress (R² = .201, p < .001). These findings were consistent with the hypotheses formulated and the theoretical perspectives. The study adds value to global evidence in relation to the Pakistani context, highlighting trait mindfulness as a preventive factor against negative emotions and emphasizing the need for culturally adapted mindfulness-based interventions to enhance psychological resilience among young adults.