Background and Objective The baseline sleep phenotype of early Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients entering lecanemab therapy is poorly characterized.Methods Forty-four consecutive early AD patients (mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia) awaiting lecanemab underwent attended polysomnography, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Forty-four controls without documented cognitive disorder, referred for polysomnography by the study’s sleep specialist over the same period, were balanced on sex, age and apnea–hypopnea index. Comparisons used independent-samples tests with Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate correction within pre-specified families.Results Obstructive sleep apnea was prevalent (61.4% moderate-to-severe) despite a body mass index of 22.5 kg/m2; groups were balanced (all p>0.15). Early AD patients showed greater wake after sleep onset (114.0 min vs. 78.7 min; q=0.006), lower sleep efficiency (67.7% vs. 77.2%; q=0.006) and shorter total sleep time (284.0 min vs. 321.1 min; q=0.039) with comparable recording time, and lower REM arousal index (13.9/h vs. 21.3/h; q=0.012). Differences were moderate (|g| 0.49–0.72); sleep-stage distribution and total arousal index did not differ. ISI (3.8 vs. 13.8) and PSQI (4.1 vs. 10.0) were nonetheless lower in AD (both q<0.001; |g| 1.52–1.86); BDI did not differ.Conclusions Early AD patients awaiting lecanemab therapy had a high prevalence of sleep apnea and reduced objective sleep continuity despite reporting fewer subjective sleep complaints than controls, a contrast that may partly reflect the symptomatic sleep-clinic comparator. Objective sleep assessment before initiating lecanemab therapy may therefore be considered.
چکیده به فارسی
زمینه و هدف: فنوتیپ خواب پایه در بیماران آلزایمر اولیه (AD) که وارد درمان با lecanemab میشوند، بهخوبی توصیف نشده است. روشها: چهلوچهار بیمار متوالی با آلزایمر اولیه (اختلال شناختی خفیف یا دمانس خفیف) که در انتظار lecanemab بودند، تحت پلیسومنوگرافی حضوری، مقیاس خوابآلودگی Epworth، شاخص شدت بیخوابی (ISI)، شاخص کیفیت خواب Pittsburgh (PSQI) و پرسشنامه افسردگی Beck (BDI) قرار گرفتند. چهلوچهار فرد کنترل بدون اختلال شناختی مستند که در همان بازه زمانی توسط متخصص خواب پژوهش برای پلیسومنوگرافی ارجاع شده بودند، از نظر جنس، سن و شاخص آپنه–هیپوآپنه متعادل شدند. مقایسهها با استفاده از آزمونهای نمونههای مستقل و تصحیح نرخ کشف کاذب Benjamini–Hochberg در خانوادههای از پیش تعیینشده انجام شد. نتایج: آپنه انسدادی خواب شایع بود (۶۱.۴٪ متوسط تا شدید) علیرغم شاخص توده بدنی ۲۲.۵ کیلوگرم/متر مربع؛ گروهها متعادل بودند (همه p>۰.۱۵). بیماران آلزایمر اولیه بیداری پس از شروع خواب بیشتری داشتند (۱۱۴.۰ دقیقه در مقابل ۷۸.۷ دقیقه؛ q=۰.۰۰۶)، کارایی خواب پایینتری (۶۷.۷٪ در مقابل ۷۷.۲٪؛ q=۰.۰۰۶) و زمان کل خواب کوتاهتری (۲۸۴.۰ دقیقه در مقابل ۳۲۱.۱ دقیقه؛ q=۰.۰۳۹) با زمان ضبط مشابه و شاخص برانگیختگی REM پایینتر (۱۳.۹/ساعت در مقابل ۲۱.۳/ساعت؛ q=۰.۰۱۲) نشان دادند. تفاوتها متوسط بود (|g| ۰.۴۹–۰.۷۲)؛ توزیع مراحل خواب و شاخص کل برانگیختگی تفاوتی نداشت. با این حال، ISI (۳.۸ در مقابل ۱۳.۸) و PSQI (۴.۱ در مقابل ۱۰.۰) در گروه AD پایینتر بود (هر دو q<۰.۰۰۱؛ |g| ۱.۵۲–۱.۸۶)؛ BDI تفاوتی نداشت. نتیجهگیری: بیماران آلزایمر اولیه در انتظار درمان با lecanemab شیوع بالای آپنه خواب و کاهش تداوم عینی خواب داشتند، اگرچه شکایات ذهنی خواب کمتری نسبت به گروه کنترل گزارش کردند که این تضاد ممکن است تا حدی بازتاب مقایسه با گروه مراجعهکننده به کلینیک خواب باشد. بنابراین، ارزیابی عینی خواب پیش از شروع درمان با lecanemab میتواند مدنظر قرار گیرد.
ترجمهی خودکار برای آشنایی سریع؛ برای نقل و ارجاع، متن اصلی ملاک است.
Choo, Y.-S., Kang, H., Yang, S.-Y., Park, H. R., Kim, J., Seo, S. W., Kim, H. J., & Joo, E. Y. (2026). Baseline Sleep Characteristics and Objective–Subjective Sleep Discordance in Early Alzheimer’s Disease Patients Prior to Lecanemab Therapy. Sleep Medicine Research, 17(3), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.17241/smr.2026.03685
با احترام و بدون توهین، تحقیر، برچسبزنی یا حملهی شخصی با دیگران گفتگو کنید.
از نوشتن هرگونه اطلاعات هویتی یا قابلشناسایی مراجعان، بیماران یا اشخاص ثالث، از جمله نام، شمارهی تماس، تصویر، نشانی، محل کار یا جزئیات منحصربهفرد پرونده خودداری کنید.
اگر دربارهی یک تجربهی بالینی سؤال میکنید، اطلاعات را تا حد ممکن بینام و کلی بیان کنید تا امکان شناسایی فرد وجود نداشته باشد.
این بخش برای یادگیری و گفتوگوی علمی است و جایگزین ارزیابی، تشخیص، مشاوره یا رواندرمانی شخصی نیست.
در شرایط بحران یا خطر آسیب به خود یا دیگران، به این بخش اتکا نکنید و برای دریافت کمک فوری با اورژانس اجتماعی ۱۲۳ یا صدای مشاور بهزیستی ۱۴۸۰ تماس بگیرید.
انتشار تبلیغات، معرفی خدمات شخصی، شمارهی تلفن، شناسهی شبکههای اجتماعی، پیوند تبلیغاتی یا درخواست جذب مراجع در این بخش مجاز نیست.
در بیان ادعاهای علمی، بهویژه دربارهی اثربخشی درمانها، تشخیص یا یافتههای پژوهشی، تا حد امکان نام منبع معتبر، مقاله یا راهنمای علمی را ذکر کنید.
از ارائهی تشخیص قطعی، تجویز درمان یا دارو و توصیههای بالینی شخصی به سایر کاربران خودداری کنید.
پاسخهایی که کارشناسان فکر بنیان میدهند با برچسب «پاسخ فکر بنیان» یا «کارشناس فکر بنیان» نمایش داده میشوند و سایر نوشتهها بیانگر نظر کاربران هستند.
گزارش نوشتهی نامناسب: اگر نوشتهای حاوی نقض محرمانگی، محتوای آسیبزا، توهین، تبلیغ یا تخلف از این قوانین است، گزینهی «گزارش» را انتخاب کنید تا تیم سایت بررسی کند.
Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic created social disruptions, leading to high levels of mental health problems for adolescents. Interpersonal stressors, such as lack of familial support, peer victimization, and discrimination, may have further exacerbated teen mental health issues. Yet, the psychological impact of interpersonal stressors and their interactive effects with high levels of loneliness remains unknown. In this pre-registered study , conducted in November and December 2020 (approximately eight months into the COVID-19 pandemic), we used a diverse sample of adolescents from across 43 U.S. states with elevated depressive symptoms (n = 2,452, ages 13–16) to examine how familial support, peer victimization, and discrimination are concurrently associated with mental health outcomes. Results indicated that perceived discrimination was the strongest standardized correlate across continuous internalizing outcomes (depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and hopelessness), whereas lack of familial support was the primary correlate of suicidal ideation; if youth reported a lack of familial support, they were over three times as likely to report suicidal ideation. Loneliness significantly moderated the cross-sectional links between lack of familial support and depressive symptoms, as well as perceived discrimination and hopelessness. Simple slope probing demonstrated a distress ceiling effect: interpersonal stressors were most strongly associated with elevated distress among youth reporting low baseline loneliness, whereas youth experiencing high loneliness exhibited consistently elevated distress regardless of stressor exposure. These findings underscore interpersonal stressors and loneliness as high-priority targets for youth prevention and intervention programs, particularly during periods of widespread social disruption.
Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the internalised stigma and self-esteem in adult outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) attending a psychiatric outpatient clinic in Iraq, and to explore the relationship between these variables. Methods: A cross-sectional correlational study among 120 adults with MDD who attended psychiatric outpatient clinics of Azadi Teaching Hospital in Kirkuk, Iraq. All participants filled out a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire, the Internalised Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI), and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficient and simple linear regression. Results: The overall mean ISMI score was 2.90 (SD = 0.42), with the highest scores for stereotype endorsement (M = 3.16) and alienation (M = 3.14) and the lowest for stigma resistance (M = 2.19). The overall mean RSES score was 2.29 (SD = 0.38). There was a negative correlation between internalised stigma and self-esteem (r = −0.338, p < 0.001). Self-esteem was statistically associated with internalised stigma (β = −0.338, t = −3.897, p < 0.001), explaining 11.4% of the variance (R² = 0.114) in simple linear regression. Conclusions: In this single-centre sample of adults with MDD, internalised stigma and self-esteem were inversely related. Since the study is a cross-sectional design, the association observed cannot be considered a causal relationship. The results provide a basis for consideration of the psychosocial aspects of routine psychiatric care (stigma and self-esteem) and for further longitudinal and multicentre research to establish temporal relationships and to determine potentially modifiable factors.
University students who live away from their families may experience loneliness and depressive symptoms, while perceived social support may alter this relationship. This study examined the associations among loneliness, perceived social support, and depressive symptoms and tested whether perceived social support moderated the loneliness-depressive symptoms relationship. A cross-sectional quantitative design involved 396 university students living in boarding houses in Yogyakarta. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlations and moderated multiple regression. Perceived social support was negatively associated with depressive symptoms. Loneliness was also significantly associated with depressive symptoms, but the direction was negative and therefore did not support the proposed positive hypothesis. The interaction between loneliness and perceived social support was significant, indicating that the loneliness slope differed across levels of support. The findings highlight the relevance of perceived social support for student mental health while also showing that the unexpected loneliness pattern requires cautious interpretation and replication.
Abstract Background Repetitive negative thinking (RNT) is a transdiagnostic process relevant to common mental health problems in primary care. RNT-ACT is a brief acceptance and commitment therapy-based protocol targeting RNT in two sessions. This pilot study assessed the feasibility of RNT-ACT compared with therapist-supported internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) in Swedish primary care. Methods Thirteen participants were randomised: 7 to RNT-ACT and 6 to iCBT. The primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate, intervention non-completion, and patient satisfaction measured with the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Symptom and process measures were secondary outcomes. Secondary outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 1- and 3-month follow-ups. Analyses were descriptive and exploratory, based on available observations without imputation of missing data. Results Thirteen of 20 eligible individuals were enrolled (65%), corresponding to 35% of all 37 individuals screened. All participants in the RNT-ACT group completed the intervention, whereas 4 of 6 participants in the iCBT group did not complete the intervention. Mean CSQ-8 scores were 27.8 (SD 3.7; n = 5) in the RNT-ACT group and 23.0 (SD 0.0; n = 2) in the iCBT group. Conclusions The small sample size and high iCBT non-completion limit between-group comparisons. Further investigation of recruitment, treatment engagement, and patient and therapist experiences is needed before determining whether and how to proceed to a full-scale RCT. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05946382 registered July 14, 2023.
The present study investigated the predictive role of trait mindfulness in relation to depression, anxiety, and stress among Pakistani young adults. The following hypotheses were formulated: H1: Trait mindfulness will significantly and negatively predict depression among Pakistani young adults. H2: Trait mindfulness will significantly and negatively predict anxiety among Pakistani young adults. H3: Trait mindfulness will significantly and negatively predict stress among Pakistani young adults. A sample of 405 participants (189 males, 216 females; aged 18–30 years, M = 22.39, SD = 2.823) completed an online survey including the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). Reliability and normality assessments confirmed the adequacy of the measures. Linear regression analyses revealed that trait mindfulness significantly and negatively predicted depression (R² = .237, p < .001), anxiety (R² = .210, p < .001), and stress (R² = .201, p < .001). These findings were consistent with the hypotheses formulated and the theoretical perspectives. The study adds value to global evidence in relation to the Pakistani context, highlighting trait mindfulness as a preventive factor against negative emotions and emphasizing the need for culturally adapted mindfulness-based interventions to enhance psychological resilience among young adults.