متن کامل این مقاله در فکر بنیان نیست؛ مشخصات و چکیده را میبینید و متن کامل را میتوانید از طریق DOI در سایت ناشر بخوانید.صفحهی مقاله در سایت ناشر ↗
چکیده
Academic stress is a major risk factor for mental health problems among college students. Existing online counseling systems often face three limitations: limited user trust in virtual interactions, insufficient adaptation to academic-stress scenarios, and inconsistent professional quality in single-agent counseling. To address these issues, we developed DHCBT, a digital human counseling system based on a hierarchical CBT multi-agent framework. Coordinated by a meta-agent and specialized expert agents, the framework structures counseling into two stages: establishment of an initial intervention framework and execution of the CBT core process. We evaluated the framework through benchmark testing on CBT-BENCH Level II, response-quality assessment on academic-stress counseling cases, and a controlled user study comparing DHCBT with a text-based chatbot. In benchmark testing, the framework showed strong performance on cognitive distortion and core-belief understanding tasks. In counseling-response evaluation, it outperformed baseline models in safety, adherence to CBT process, problem comprehension, and empathy. In the user study, DHCBT was associated with lower cognitive load and higher social presence, usability, and intention to continue use than the text-based control. These findings provide preliminary evidence that combining a digital human counseling interface with a CBT multi-agent framework is feasible for supporting college students with mild-to-moderate academic stress.
چکیده به فارسی
فشار تحصیلی یکی از عوامل خطر اصلی برای مشکلات سلامت روان در میان دانشجویان دانشگاه است. سامانههای مشاوره آنلاین موجود اغلب با سه محدودیت مواجه هستند: اعتماد محدود کاربران به تعاملات مجازی، سازگاری ناکافی با سناریوهای فشار تحصیلی، و کیفیت حرفهای ناسازگار در مشاوره تکعاملی. برای رفع این مسائل، ما سامانه DHCBT را توسعه دادیم که مبتنی بر چارچوب چندعاملی سلسلهمراتبی درمان شناختی-رفتاری (CBT) است. این چارچوب با هماهنگی یک فراعامل (meta-agent) و عوامل متخصص (expert agents)، فرایند مشاوره را به دو مرحله تقسیم میکند: ایجاد چارچوب اولیه مداخله و اجرای فرایند اصلی CBT. ما این چارچوب را از طریق آزمون معیار در سطح دوم CBT-BENCH، ارزیابی کیفیت پاسخ در موارد مشاوره فشار تحصیلی، و یک مطالعه کنترلشده کاربری که DHCBT را با یک چتبات متنی مقایسه میکند، ارزیابی کردیم. در آزمون معیار، این چارچوب عملکرد قویای در وظایف درک تحریفهای شناختی و باورهای هستهای نشان داد. در ارزیابی پاسخهای مشاورهای، نسبت به مدلهای پایه در ایمنی، پایبندی به فرایند CBT، درک مسئله و همدلی برتری داشت. در مطالعه کاربری، DHCBT با بار شناختی کمتر و حضور اجتماعی، قابلیت استفاده و قصد ادامه استفاده بالاتر نسبت به کنترل متنی همراه بود. این یافتهها شواهد اولیهای فراهم میکند که ترکیب رابط مشاوره انسان دیجیتال با چارچوب چندعاملی CBT برای حمایت از دانشجویان با فشار تحصیلی خفیف تا متوسط امکانپذیر است.
ترجمهی خودکار برای آشنایی سریع؛ برای نقل و ارجاع، متن اصلی ملاک است.
Tan, L., Li, Z., Huang, Y., Liu, J., Ni, M., Wang, S., Che, J., & Chen, K. (2026). DHCBT: a digital human psychological counseling system with a CBT multi-agent framework. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-73798-9
با احترام و بدون توهین، تحقیر، برچسبزنی یا حملهی شخصی با دیگران گفتگو کنید.
از نوشتن هرگونه اطلاعات هویتی یا قابلشناسایی مراجعان، بیماران یا اشخاص ثالث، از جمله نام، شمارهی تماس، تصویر، نشانی، محل کار یا جزئیات منحصربهفرد پرونده خودداری کنید.
اگر دربارهی یک تجربهی بالینی سؤال میکنید، اطلاعات را تا حد ممکن بینام و کلی بیان کنید تا امکان شناسایی فرد وجود نداشته باشد.
این بخش برای یادگیری و گفتوگوی علمی است و جایگزین ارزیابی، تشخیص، مشاوره یا رواندرمانی شخصی نیست.
در شرایط بحران یا خطر آسیب به خود یا دیگران، به این بخش اتکا نکنید و برای دریافت کمک فوری با اورژانس اجتماعی ۱۲۳ یا صدای مشاور بهزیستی ۱۴۸۰ تماس بگیرید.
انتشار تبلیغات، معرفی خدمات شخصی، شمارهی تلفن، شناسهی شبکههای اجتماعی، پیوند تبلیغاتی یا درخواست جذب مراجع در این بخش مجاز نیست.
در بیان ادعاهای علمی، بهویژه دربارهی اثربخشی درمانها، تشخیص یا یافتههای پژوهشی، تا حد امکان نام منبع معتبر، مقاله یا راهنمای علمی را ذکر کنید.
از ارائهی تشخیص قطعی، تجویز درمان یا دارو و توصیههای بالینی شخصی به سایر کاربران خودداری کنید.
پاسخهایی که کارشناسان فکر بنیان میدهند با برچسب «پاسخ فکر بنیان» یا «کارشناس فکر بنیان» نمایش داده میشوند و سایر نوشتهها بیانگر نظر کاربران هستند.
گزارش نوشتهی نامناسب: اگر نوشتهای حاوی نقض محرمانگی، محتوای آسیبزا، توهین، تبلیغ یا تخلف از این قوانین است، گزینهی «گزارش» را انتخاب کنید تا تیم سایت بررسی کند.
Quality higher education plays a vital role in sustainable development by equipping graduates with knowledge, competencies, and skills required for economic and societal development. This study examined the relationship between instructional strategies and the employability skills of undergraduate students in the School of Art and Industrial Design at Kyambogo University, Uganda. Specifically, it investigated the relationships between cooperative teaching, collaborative teaching, inquiry/discovery learning, independent study, experiential (authentic) learning, project-based learning, and students’ employability skills. The study adopted a quantitative approach using a correlational research design. Data were collected from 378 third-year undergraduate students using a structured self-administered questionnaire. Pearson’s product-moment correlation and multiple regression analyses were used to determine the direction and statistical associations between instructional strategies and employability skills. Findings showed that cooperative teaching, inquiry/discovery learning, and experiential teaching had positive statistically significant associations with employability skills, whereas collaborative teaching had a negative statistical association. Independent study and project-based teaching had no statistically significant unique associations with employability skills. Inquiry/discovery teaching demonstrated the strongest statistical association with employability skills among the strategies examined. The study concluded that instructional strategies had different statistical associations with employability skills and that learner-centred approaches are most beneficial when they actively engage students in cooperative, inquiry-oriented, and authentic learning experiences aligned with intended graduate outcomes. The study recommended strengthening cooperative, inquiry, and experiential teaching through structured group tasks, inquiry-based activities, and authentic practical experiences. It further recommended improving the design and implementation of collaborative, independent, and project-based learning to enhance their contribution to graduate employability skills.
Over the last decade, there has been a visible surge of students participating in and leading different forms of activism. Following the cultural reckoning of 2020, the United States saw a rise in awareness and engagement in activism among young individuals. Continuing this trend, higher education institutions have seen an increase in on-campus demonstrations in recent years. Given the recent increase in activism, political engagement, and the globalization of social issues, this study examined how attitudes, beliefs, individual factors, and prior behaviors relate to undergraduate students’ willingness to engage in different forms of activism (i.e., conventional and high-risk). Across both forms of activism, institutional advocacy (i.e., the behavioral targeting of institutional racism) was the most consistent unique predictor of a student's willingness to engage in activism. Need for cognition and individual advocacy were significantly and positively related to conventional activism, whereas political orientation was negatively related to it. Social justice orientation was significantly and negatively related to high-risk activism.
This study addresses the critical deficiency in speaking skills among university students, a challenge primarily attributed to the reliance on traditional teaching methods and the limited time allocated for authentic verbal practice within the classroom. The research aims to construct a comprehensive theoretical framework for the Flipped Classroom strategy and identify the pedagogical and linguistic justifications for its implementation in developing speaking skills, while providing practical procedural recommendations for its integration into higher education. Adopting a descriptive-analytical approach through a critical review of educational literature, the findings reveal that the flipped model significantly enhances students' fluency, linguistic accuracy, and capacity for spontaneous expression. Furthermore, the model fosters increased motivation and active participation by granting learners the autonomy to progress at their own pace, as pre-class preparation helps mitigate "language anxiety" and bolsters confidence during real-time communicative interactions. Despite these advantages, the research identifies several implementation challenges, most notably the digital divide, potential cognitive overload, and the necessity for intensive faculty training in digital instructional design. Ultimately, the study concludes that the Flipped Classroom represents a fundamental philosophical shift that redefines educational roles, transforming class time from passive instruction into a dynamic "living linguistic laboratory" focused on intensive communicative practice.
The purpose of this research is to analyze the economic self-management strategies used by students of the Faculty of Business Sciences of the Technical University of Machala during their academic training; Interest in this study arose from the need to understand how students face economic difficulties that arise in their training. A mixed approach was applied and a survey was used on a representative sample of 367 students, identifying the main source of income for a part of the student population, evidencing alternatives to sustain their expenses and reduce their economic dependence. The most used strategies were observed when they go through difficult situations and if the income is sufficient to cover their expenses, reflecting the existence of limitations and conditioning the way of organizing their resources and decision making. Likewise, it was identified that students usually perceive an impact. in their academic performance. The results allowed us to understand the economic dynamics experienced by university students and provide information for the design of institutional strategies that contribute to strengthening permanence, well-being and academic success.
Short-term field trips enable learners to bridge the pedagogical gap between academic knowledge (theory) and the practicalities of their discipline in a real-world setting. In Ireland, there has been a dearth of empirical research into the essence of short-term field trips as a teaching and learning strategy for criminal justice students. The purpose of this article is to bridge that pedagogical gap through thematic analysis of qualitative data of student learning experiences in the context of a short-term field trip to an operational prison. Research findings based on semi-structured interviews with students who participated in the active learning experience show evidence of the essence of experiential learning activities which could not be achieved to the same level in academic seminars alone. In essence, students contextualise their academic (theory) knowledge, which is a catalyst for gaining a deep and flexible understanding. In consequence of the sensitive nature of the operational prison, and compliance with security protocols, some limitations were also reported by participants, notably the short-term duration of the field trip and the use of conventional methods of documenting active learning experiences was not possible. Keywords: higher education, participatory action research, experiential learning, short-term field trip, operational prison, reflection in action, reflection on action, thematic analysis of qualitative data