فکر بنیانبانک مقالات روان‌شناسی
دسترسی آزاد پژوهشی داوری‌شده انگلیسی

Research Review: The effect of school‐based suicide prevention on suicidal ideation and suicide attempts and the role of intervention and contextual factors among adolescents: a meta‐analysis and meta‐regression

مرور پژوهش: تأثیر پیشگیری از خودکشی مبتنی بر مدرسه بر افکار خودکشی و اقدام به خودکشی و نقش عوامل مداخله‌ای و زمینه‌ای در میان نوجوانان: یک فراتحلیل و فرارگرسیون

Eibhlin H. Walsh iD, Jennifer McMahon iD, Matthew P. Herring iD

Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2022 Vol. 63(8), pp. 836-845
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13598

ورود برای خواندن متن کاملبرای خواندن متن کامل وارد حساب فکر بنیان شوید.

چکیده

Background

Globally, suicide is the fourth highest cause of adolescent mortality ( Suicide : https://www.who.int/news‐room/fact‐sheets/detail/suicide ). The effects of post‐primary school‐based suicide prevention (PSSP) on adolescent suicidal thoughts and behaviours (STBs) have not been comprehensively synthesised. We aim to estimate the population effect for PSSP interventions on adolescent STBs and explore how intervention effects vary based on intervention and contextual moderators.

Methods

Searches of PsycINFO, Medline, Education Source, ERIC, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials identified cluster randomised trials examining the effectiveness of PSSP on adolescent STBs. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool assessed bias. Crude and adjusted back‐transformed odds ratios (ORs) were calculated. Multilevel random‐effects models accounted for dependencies of effects. Univariate meta‐regression explored variability of intervention and contextual moderators on pooled effects.

Results

There were 19 and 12 effects for suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempts (SA). Compared with controls, interventions were associated with 13% (OR = 0.87, 95%CI [0.78, 0.96]) and 34% (OR = 0.66, 95%CI [0.47, 0.91]) lower crude odds reductions for SI and SA, respectively. Effects were similar for adjusted SI (OR = 0.85, 95%CI [0.75, 0.95]) and SA (OR = 0.72, 95%CI [0.59, 0.87]) models. Within‐study (0.20–9.10%) and between‐study (0–51.20%) heterogeneity ranged for crude and adjusted SA models and SI heterogeneity was 0%. Moderator analyses did not vary SA effects ( p s > .05).

Conclusions

This meta‐analysis contributes to the PSSP evidence‐base by demonstrating that PSSP targeting STBs as both primary intervention outcomes and with other health and well‐being outcomes reduced SI and SA among 33,155 adolescents attending 329 schools, compared to controls. The number needed to treat estimates suggests the potential of reducing the incidence of SA and SI in one adolescent by implementing PSSP in 1–2 classrooms, supporting PSSP as a clinically relevant suicide prevention strategy. Although moderator analyses were nonsignificant and contained a small number of trials, larger SA effect sizes support particular effectiveness for interventions of a duration of ≤1 week, involving multiple stakeholders and with a 12‐month follow‐up.

چکیده از Crossref، به همان صورتی که ناشر منتشر کرده است.

چکیده به فارسی

زمینه: خودکشی در سطح جهانی چهارمین علت مرگ‌ومیر نوجوانان است (خودکشی: https://www.who.int/news‐room/fact‐sheets/detail/suicide). آثار پیشگیری از خودکشی مبتنی بر مدرسه پس از دوره ابتدایی (PSSP) بر افکار و رفتارهای خودکشی نوجوانان (STBs) به طور جامع تلفیق نشده است. هدف ما برآورد اثر جمعیتی مداخلات PSSP بر STBs نوجوانان و بررسی چگونگی تغییر آثار مداخله بر اساس عوامل مداخله‌ای و زمینه‌ای است. روش‌ها: جستجو در پایگاه‌های PsycINFO، Medline، Education Source، ERIC، Web of Science و Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials، کارآزمایی‌های تصادفی خوشه‌ای را که اثربخشی PSSP بر STBs نوجوانان را بررسی کرده‌اند، شناسایی کرد. ابزار Cochrane Risk of Bias برای ارزیابی سوگیری به کار رفت. نسبت شانس خام و تعدیل‌شده (OR) پس‌گردانده محاسبه شد. مدل‌های تصادفی چندسطحی برای وابستگی آثار در نظر گرفته شد. فرارگرسیون تک‌متغیره برای بررسی تغییرپذیری عوامل مداخله‌ای و زمینه‌ای بر آثار تجمیعی به کار رفت. یافته‌ها: ۱۹ و ۱۲ اثر برای افکار خودکشی (SI) و اقدام به خودکشی (SA) وجود داشت. در مقایسه با گروه کنترل، مداخلات با کاهش ۱۳٪ (OR = 0.87, 95%CI [0.78, 0.96]) و ۳۴٪ (OR = 0.66, 95%CI [0.47, 0.91]) در نسبت شانس خام برای SI و SA همراه بود. آثار برای مدل‌های تعدیل‌شده SI (OR = 0.85, 95%CI [0.75, 0.95]) و SA (OR = 0.72, 95%CI [0.59, 0.87]) مشابه بود. ناهمگنی درون‌مطالعه‌ای (۰.۲۰–۹.۱۰٪) و بین‌مطالعه‌ای (۰–۵۱.۲۰٪) برای مدل‌های خام و تعدیل‌شده SA متغیر بود و ناهمگنی SI برابر با ۰٪ بود. تحلیل عوامل مداخله‌ای تفاوتی در آثار SA نشان نداد (ps > .05). نتیجه‌گیری: این فراتحلیل با نشان دادن اینکه PSSP که STBs را به عنوان پیامد اولیه مداخله و همراه با سایر پیامدهای سلامت و رفاه هدف قرار می‌دهد، SI و SA را در میان ۳۳٬۱۵۵ نوجوان حاضر در ۳۲۹ مدرسه نسبت به گروه کنترل کاهش داده است، به شواهد PSSP می‌افزاید. برآوردهای تعداد مورد نیاز برای درمان نشان می‌دهد که اجرای PSSP در ۱ تا ۲ کلاس می‌تواند بروز SA و SI را در یک نوجوان کاهش دهد و از PSSP به عنوان یک راهبرد پیشگیری از خودکشی با اهمیت بالینی حمایت می‌کند. اگرچه تحلیل عوامل مداخله‌ای معنادار نبود و شامل تعداد کمی کارآزمایی بود، اندازه اثر بزرگ‌تر SA از اثربخشی ویژه مداخلاتی با مدت ≤۱ هفته، با مشارکت ذینفعان متعدد و پیگیری ۱۲ ماهه حمایت می‌کند.

ترجمه‌ی خودکار برای آشنایی سریع؛ برای نقل و ارجاع، متن اصلی ملاک است.

موضوع‌ها و کلیدواژه‌ها

خودکشیدرمانسلامت روانافکار خودکشیSuicide attemptadolescent mental healthcontextual moderatorsintervention moderatorsschool-based suicide preventionsuicide prevention interventionsنوجوانان

ارجاع

Walsh, E. H., McMahon, J., & Herring, M. P. (2022). Research Review: The effect of school‐based suicide prevention on suicidal ideation and suicide attempts and the role of intervention and contextual factors among adolescents: a meta‐analysis and meta‐regression. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(8), 836–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13598

(Walsh et al., 2022)

دانلود BibTeX · دانلود RIS

گفت‌وگو

قوانین پرسش و گفتگو
  1. با احترام و بدون توهین، تحقیر، برچسب‌زنی یا حمله‌ی شخصی با دیگران گفتگو کنید.
  2. از نوشتن هرگونه اطلاعات هویتی یا قابل‌شناسایی مراجعان، بیماران یا اشخاص ثالث، از جمله نام، شماره‌ی تماس، تصویر، نشانی، محل کار یا جزئیات منحصربه‌فرد پرونده خودداری کنید.
  3. اگر درباره‌ی یک تجربه‌ی بالینی سؤال می‌کنید، اطلاعات را تا حد ممکن بی‌نام و کلی بیان کنید تا امکان شناسایی فرد وجود نداشته باشد.
  4. این بخش برای یادگیری و گفت‌وگوی علمی است و جایگزین ارزیابی، تشخیص، مشاوره یا روان‌درمانی شخصی نیست.
  5. در شرایط بحران یا خطر آسیب به خود یا دیگران، به این بخش اتکا نکنید و برای دریافت کمک فوری با اورژانس اجتماعی ۱۲۳ یا صدای مشاور بهزیستی ۱۴۸۰ تماس بگیرید.
  6. انتشار تبلیغات، معرفی خدمات شخصی، شماره‌ی تلفن، شناسه‌ی شبکه‌های اجتماعی، پیوند تبلیغاتی یا درخواست جذب مراجع در این بخش مجاز نیست.
  7. در بیان ادعاهای علمی، به‌ویژه درباره‌ی اثربخشی درمان‌ها، تشخیص یا یافته‌های پژوهشی، تا حد امکان نام منبع معتبر، مقاله یا راهنمای علمی را ذکر کنید.
  8. از ارائه‌ی تشخیص قطعی، تجویز درمان یا دارو و توصیه‌های بالینی شخصی به سایر کاربران خودداری کنید.
  9. پاسخ‌هایی که کارشناسان فکر بنیان می‌دهند با برچسب «پاسخ فکر بنیان» یا «کارشناس فکر بنیان» نمایش داده می‌شوند و سایر نوشته‌ها بیانگر نظر کاربران هستند.
  10. گزارش نوشته‌ی نامناسب: اگر نوشته‌ای حاوی نقض محرمانگی، محتوای آسیب‌زا، توهین، تبلیغ یا تخلف از این قوانین است، گزینه‌ی «گزارش» را انتخاب کنید تا تیم سایت بررسی کند.

برای پرسیدن و پاسخ دادن باید مشترک باشید. ورود

هنوز پرسشی منتشر نشده است.

مقاله‌های مرتبط

Supporting life beyond the finish line: A cross-sectional analysis of retirement transition policies for professional riders in European cycling

Michael Liebrenz Journal Of Science & Cycling, 2026

چکیده

Transitioning out of professional sport can present challenges for athletes and their wider environments, frequently necessitating coordinated physical, psychological, and economic support. Although these concerns have been documented in elite cycling, the extent to which structured transition programmes exist within the sport remains insufficiently understood, particularly in Europe, the historical centre of professional cycling. We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative documentary analysis, distributing a standardised inquiry to all European Cycling Federations (ECFs; N = 51) between December 2024-March 2025. Federations were asked whether they had formal strategies, policies, or resources related to athlete retirement. Responses were categorised as “ECF-level literature or initiative”, “No ECF-level provision”, or “No response” and relevant materials were descriptively synthesised. Amongst the 21 federations that responded, the majority (n = 17; ≈81%) reported no ECF-level retirement initiatives. Common reasons included limited resources, low perceived demand, or reliance on national or international bodies (i.e., Olympic Committees or sport-specific unions). Four ECFs (~19%) described transition-related structures, though these varied considerably in scope, definition, and delivery. Despite well-documented needs, structured retirement support for professional cyclists remains uncommon across European national federations, and existing programmes appear heterogeneously applied. As cycling expands globally, effective transition planning becomes increasingly important for athlete wellbeing and the long-term sustainability of the sport. Holistic, international collaborations led by cycling’s major governance bodies could strengthen career-long support systems, reinforce the public image of cycling as a health-promoting discipline, and create responsible, athlete-centered ecosystems.

دسترسی آزاد

Faktor yang Memengaruhi Kualitas Tidur Pasien Gagal Ginjal Kronik

Sukamdani Amanjaya; Nazaruddin; Asbath Jurnal Riset Keperawatan dan Kesehatan, 2026, Vol. 3, Issue 5, pp. 442-452 https://doi.org/10.71203/jrkk.v3i5.193

چکیده

Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis frequently experience physical and psychological complaints that may affect their sleep quality. Uremic pruritus, restless legs syndrome, anxiety, and post-hemodialysis fatigue are potential factors that may disrupt sleep quality. Objective: This study aimed to identify the factors influencing the sleep quality of patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis at Bahteramas Regional General Hospital, Southeast Sulawesi Province. Methods: This study employed a quantitative analytical approach with a cross-sectional design. The sample consisted of 83 respondents. Data were collected using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), 5-D Itch Scale, International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A), and a post-hemodialysis fatigue assessment instrument. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test and binary logistic regression. Results: Bivariate analysis showed that uremic pruritus (p = 0.046), restless legs syndrome (p = 0.015), anxiety (p = 0.029), and post-hemodialysis fatigue (p = 0.049) were statistically significant factors associated with sleep quality. Simultaneously, the four variables had a statistically significant effect on sleep quality (p = 0.007), with a Nagelkerke R Square value of 0.217. In the multivariable analysis, only anxiety showed a statistically significant independent effect (p = 0.019). Conclusion: Uremic pruritus, restless legs syndrome, anxiety, and post-hemodialysis fatigue were statistically associated with sleep quality in the bivariate analysis. The four variables were jointly significant in the multivariable model, whereas only anxiety remained statistically significant after adjustment for the other variables.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد

Digital dinacharya and workplace burnout: a cross-sectional analytical study of occupational health

Neha S. Maske; Kirti Bhausaheb Gaikwad; Meera K Bhojani International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 2026, Vol. 14, Issue 11, pp. 5233-5240 https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20264183

چکیده

Background: Prolonged screen exposure, after-hours connectivity, and sedentary work are linked to poor sleep and occupational burnout among Indian working professionals. Ayurvedic Dinacharya regulates waking, Vyayama, Bhojana Vidhi, and Nidra Vidhi; however, digital-era disruption of these domains among working adults remains unstudied. This study aimed to assess digital lifestyle behaviours mapped to Dinacharya principles as behavioural markers of Pragyaparadha, in relation to sleep quality and occupational burnout among working adults, and to identify behaviours independently associated with poor sleep and higher burnout. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical survey (STROBE-reported) was conducted at the All-India Institute of Ayurveda (AIIA), New Delhi, during (January 2026 to July 2026), among 400 working adults aged 25-40 years with ≥1 year of occupational experience. A structured proforma captured sociodemographic details and Dinacharya-mapped digital behaviours across five domains (morning routine, bedtime device use, after-hours connectivity, screen breaks/sedentary time, mealtime practices). Sleep quality and burnout were assessed using the PSQI and Copenhagen burnout inventory. Results: Of 400 participants, 56.8% had poor sleep quality, 61% personal burnout, and 55.8% work-related burnout. Bedtime device use and inadequate screen breaks/sedentary behaviour independently predicted poor sleep (aOR 1.76 and 1.98). After-hours connectivity, sedentary behaviour, and mealtime digital engagement predicted personal burnout; bedtime device use, sedentary behaviour, mealtime digital engagement, and digital overload predicted work-related burnout (all p<0.05). Conclusions: Digital lifestyle behaviours reflect patterns of Pragyaparadha in daily digital conduct. Interpreted through Dinacharya and Nidra, the findings support a culturally grounded, preventive Digital Dinacharya framework for digital-era occupational health.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد

Childhood Emotional Neglect, Psychological Distress: Moderating role of Peer Support in Young Adults

Saba Noreen; Zarrin Atif International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries Social Science, 2026, Vol. 5, Issue 6, pp. 18-45 https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemd-ss.2026.05.6.875

چکیده

Psychological distress during young adulthood may be influenced by early emotional experiences and current interpersonal relationships. The current study investigates the relationship between childhood emotional neglect, peer support and psychological distress in young adults. A quantitative research design was used with 200 participants aged 18-25 years selected through purposive sampling from educational institutions of Lahore. Childhood emotional neglect, peer support and psychological distress were measured with the Childhood Emotional Neglect Questionnaire (CENQ), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived social support (MSPSS), and Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), respectively. Data were analyzed using Pearson- product moment correlation, hierarchical regression, PROCESS moderation analysis and one way ANOVA. Childhood emotional neglect was significantly and positively associated with psychological distress while peer support was not significantly and directly associated with psychological distress. Hierarchical regression indicates that psychological distress was significantly predicted by childhood emotional neglect, while peer support was not a significant direct predictor. The regression model explained 12.5% of variance in psychological distress. Moderation analysis showed significant interaction effects of friends’ support (P= .017) and family support (P= .032), indicating that these sources of support moderated the relationship between childhood emotional neglect and psychological distress. There were significant socio-economic differences for childhood emotional and peer support, but not for psychological distress. The findings highlight the importance of considering childhood emotional experiences and interpersonal resources when understanding psychological distress among young adults.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد