فکر بنیانبانک مقالات روان‌شناسی
دسترسی آزاد پژوهشی داوری‌شده انگلیسی

Screening-based low energy availability risk, disordered eating risk, and their co-occurrence among female volleyball players: a cross-sectional study

غربالگری خطر در دسترس بودن پایین انرژی، خطر اختلالات خوردن و هم‌زمانی آن‌ها در بازیکنان والیبال زن: یک مطالعه مقطعی

Hülya André, Derya Çetin Sarışık, Arda Özçelik

PLoS ONE 2026 Vol. 21(10), pp. e0360395
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360395

ورود برای خواندن متن کاملبرای خواندن متن کامل وارد حساب فکر بنیان شوید.

چکیده

Low energy availability (LEA) and disordered eating (DE) are important health concerns in female athletes, yet their occurrence and co-occurrence in team-sport contexts, particularly volleyball, remain underexplored. This cross-sectional online survey study examined the proportions of athletes classified as being at risk of LEA and DE overall and across competition levels, and assessed the co-occurrence between the two risk classifications in female volleyball players in Türkiye, using the Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire (LEAF-Q) and Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26). It also examined correlations between EAT-26 total score and LEAF-Q total and domain scores. A total of 213 athletes, recruited via non-probability convenience sampling, completed the LEAF-Q and EAT-26 to assess LEA risk and DE risk, respectively. In this sample, 33.3% of athletes were classified as being at risk of LEA, with no difference across competition levels ( p = 0.825). A total of 17.4% were classified as being at risk of DE, with variation across competition levels and the highest proportion among Turkish Women’s Volleyball Second League athletes ( p = 0.034). LEA risk and DE risk co-occurred in 10.3% of the sample, and DE risk was associated with higher odds of LEA risk (unadjusted OR = 3.80, 95% CI: 1.82–7.92). EAT-26 total score was positively correlated with LEAF-Q total and gastrointestinal function scores ( p < 0.001) and injury history score ( p = 0.004), but not menstrual function score ( p = 0.133). These results suggest that LEA risk was commonly identified in this sample, DE risk was comparatively less common, and their co-occurrence was only partial, highlighting the value of screening for both risks rather than assuming one from the other.

چکیده به فارسی

در دسترس بودن پایین انرژی (LEA) و اختلالات خوردن (DE) از نگرانی‌های مهم سلامت در ورزشکاران زن هستند، اما بروز و هم‌زمانی آن‌ها در زمینه‌های ورزش‌های تیمی، به‌ویژه والیبال، کمتر مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. این مطالعه مقطعی به‌صورت پیمایش آنلاین، نسبت ورزشکارانی را که به‌طور کلی و در سطوح مختلف رقابتی در معرض خطر LEA و DE قرار دارند، بررسی کرده و هم‌زمانی بین این دو طبقه‌بندی خطر را در بازیکنان والیبال زن در ترکیه با استفاده از پرسشنامه Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire (LEAF-Q) و آزمون نگرش‌های خوردن ۲۶ (EAT-26) ارزیابی نمود. همچنین همبستگی بین نمره کل EAT-26 و نمره کل و نمرات حوزه‌های مختلف LEAF-Q را بررسی کرد. در مجموع ۲۱۳ ورزشکار که از طریق نمونه‌گیری در دسترس غیرتصادفی جذب شدند، برای ارزیابی خطر LEA و خطر DE به‌ترتیب، پرسشنامه LEAF-Q و EAT-26 را تکمیل کردند. در این نمونه، ۳۳.۳٪ از ورزشکاران در معرض خطر LEA طبقه‌بندی شدند و تفاوتی در سطوح مختلف رقابتی مشاهده نشد (p = ۰.۸۲۵). در مجموع ۱۷.۴٪ در معرض خطر DE قرار داشتند که این میزان در سطوح رقابتی متفاوت بود و بالاترین نسبت در میان ورزشکاران لیگ دوم والیبال زنان ترکیه مشاهده شد (p = ۰.۰۳۴). خطر LEA و خطر DE در ۱۰.۳٪ از نمونه به‌طور هم‌زمان مشاهده شد و خطر DE با افزایش شانس خطر LEA همراه بود (OR خام = ۳.۸۰، ۹۵٪ CI: ۱.۸۲–۷.۹۲). نمره کل EAT-26 با نمره کل LEAF-Q و نمره عملکرد دستگاه گوارش (p < ۰.۰۰۱) و نمره سابقه آسیب‌دیدگی (p = ۰.۰۰۴) همبستگی مثبت داشت، اما با نمره عملکرد قاعدگی همبستگی نداشت (p = ۰.۱۳۳). این نتایج نشان می‌دهد که خطر LEA در این نمونه به‌طور شایع شناسایی شد، خطر DE نسبتاً کمتر بود و هم‌زمانی آن‌ها تنها جزئی بود که بر اهمیت غربالگری هر دو خطر به‌جای فرض یکی بر اساس دیگری تأکید می‌کند.

ترجمه‌ی خودکار برای آشنایی سریع؛ برای نقل و ارجاع، متن اصلی ملاک است.

موضوع‌ها و کلیدواژه‌ها

سلامت روانDisordered eatingLEAF-Qco-occurrencecompetitive levelfemale athletesfemale volleyball playerslow energy availabilityscreening

ارجاع

André, H., Sarışık, D. Ç., & Özçelik, A. (2026). Screening-based low energy availability risk, disordered eating risk, and their co-occurrence among female volleyball players: a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 21(10), e0360395. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360395

(André et al., 2026)

دانلود BibTeX · دانلود RIS

گفت‌وگو

قوانین پرسش و گفتگو
  1. با احترام و بدون توهین، تحقیر، برچسب‌زنی یا حمله‌ی شخصی با دیگران گفتگو کنید.
  2. از نوشتن هرگونه اطلاعات هویتی یا قابل‌شناسایی مراجعان، بیماران یا اشخاص ثالث، از جمله نام، شماره‌ی تماس، تصویر، نشانی، محل کار یا جزئیات منحصربه‌فرد پرونده خودداری کنید.
  3. اگر درباره‌ی یک تجربه‌ی بالینی سؤال می‌کنید، اطلاعات را تا حد ممکن بی‌نام و کلی بیان کنید تا امکان شناسایی فرد وجود نداشته باشد.
  4. این بخش برای یادگیری و گفت‌وگوی علمی است و جایگزین ارزیابی، تشخیص، مشاوره یا روان‌درمانی شخصی نیست.
  5. در شرایط بحران یا خطر آسیب به خود یا دیگران، به این بخش اتکا نکنید و برای دریافت کمک فوری با اورژانس اجتماعی ۱۲۳ یا صدای مشاور بهزیستی ۱۴۸۰ تماس بگیرید.
  6. انتشار تبلیغات، معرفی خدمات شخصی، شماره‌ی تلفن، شناسه‌ی شبکه‌های اجتماعی، پیوند تبلیغاتی یا درخواست جذب مراجع در این بخش مجاز نیست.
  7. در بیان ادعاهای علمی، به‌ویژه درباره‌ی اثربخشی درمان‌ها، تشخیص یا یافته‌های پژوهشی، تا حد امکان نام منبع معتبر، مقاله یا راهنمای علمی را ذکر کنید.
  8. از ارائه‌ی تشخیص قطعی، تجویز درمان یا دارو و توصیه‌های بالینی شخصی به سایر کاربران خودداری کنید.
  9. پاسخ‌هایی که کارشناسان فکر بنیان می‌دهند با برچسب «پاسخ فکر بنیان» یا «کارشناس فکر بنیان» نمایش داده می‌شوند و سایر نوشته‌ها بیانگر نظر کاربران هستند.
  10. گزارش نوشته‌ی نامناسب: اگر نوشته‌ای حاوی نقض محرمانگی، محتوای آسیب‌زا، توهین، تبلیغ یا تخلف از این قوانین است، گزینه‌ی «گزارش» را انتخاب کنید تا تیم سایت بررسی کند.

برای پرسیدن و پاسخ دادن باید مشترک باشید. ورود

هنوز پرسشی منتشر نشده است.

مقاله‌های مرتبط

Supporting life beyond the finish line: A cross-sectional analysis of retirement transition policies for professional riders in European cycling

Michael Liebrenz Journal Of Science & Cycling, 2026

چکیده

Transitioning out of professional sport can present challenges for athletes and their wider environments, frequently necessitating coordinated physical, psychological, and economic support. Although these concerns have been documented in elite cycling, the extent to which structured transition programmes exist within the sport remains insufficiently understood, particularly in Europe, the historical centre of professional cycling. We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative documentary analysis, distributing a standardised inquiry to all European Cycling Federations (ECFs; N = 51) between December 2024-March 2025. Federations were asked whether they had formal strategies, policies, or resources related to athlete retirement. Responses were categorised as “ECF-level literature or initiative”, “No ECF-level provision”, or “No response” and relevant materials were descriptively synthesised. Amongst the 21 federations that responded, the majority (n = 17; ≈81%) reported no ECF-level retirement initiatives. Common reasons included limited resources, low perceived demand, or reliance on national or international bodies (i.e., Olympic Committees or sport-specific unions). Four ECFs (~19%) described transition-related structures, though these varied considerably in scope, definition, and delivery. Despite well-documented needs, structured retirement support for professional cyclists remains uncommon across European national federations, and existing programmes appear heterogeneously applied. As cycling expands globally, effective transition planning becomes increasingly important for athlete wellbeing and the long-term sustainability of the sport. Holistic, international collaborations led by cycling’s major governance bodies could strengthen career-long support systems, reinforce the public image of cycling as a health-promoting discipline, and create responsible, athlete-centered ecosystems.

دسترسی آزاد

Faktor yang Memengaruhi Kualitas Tidur Pasien Gagal Ginjal Kronik

Sukamdani Amanjaya; Nazaruddin; Asbath Jurnal Riset Keperawatan dan Kesehatan, 2026, Vol. 3, Issue 5, pp. 442-452 https://doi.org/10.71203/jrkk.v3i5.193

چکیده

Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis frequently experience physical and psychological complaints that may affect their sleep quality. Uremic pruritus, restless legs syndrome, anxiety, and post-hemodialysis fatigue are potential factors that may disrupt sleep quality. Objective: This study aimed to identify the factors influencing the sleep quality of patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis at Bahteramas Regional General Hospital, Southeast Sulawesi Province. Methods: This study employed a quantitative analytical approach with a cross-sectional design. The sample consisted of 83 respondents. Data were collected using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), 5-D Itch Scale, International Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (IRLS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A), and a post-hemodialysis fatigue assessment instrument. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test and binary logistic regression. Results: Bivariate analysis showed that uremic pruritus (p = 0.046), restless legs syndrome (p = 0.015), anxiety (p = 0.029), and post-hemodialysis fatigue (p = 0.049) were statistically significant factors associated with sleep quality. Simultaneously, the four variables had a statistically significant effect on sleep quality (p = 0.007), with a Nagelkerke R Square value of 0.217. In the multivariable analysis, only anxiety showed a statistically significant independent effect (p = 0.019). Conclusion: Uremic pruritus, restless legs syndrome, anxiety, and post-hemodialysis fatigue were statistically associated with sleep quality in the bivariate analysis. The four variables were jointly significant in the multivariable model, whereas only anxiety remained statistically significant after adjustment for the other variables.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد

Digital dinacharya and workplace burnout: a cross-sectional analytical study of occupational health

Neha S. Maske; Kirti Bhausaheb Gaikwad; Meera K Bhojani International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 2026, Vol. 14, Issue 11, pp. 5233-5240 https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20264183

چکیده

Background: Prolonged screen exposure, after-hours connectivity, and sedentary work are linked to poor sleep and occupational burnout among Indian working professionals. Ayurvedic Dinacharya regulates waking, Vyayama, Bhojana Vidhi, and Nidra Vidhi; however, digital-era disruption of these domains among working adults remains unstudied. This study aimed to assess digital lifestyle behaviours mapped to Dinacharya principles as behavioural markers of Pragyaparadha, in relation to sleep quality and occupational burnout among working adults, and to identify behaviours independently associated with poor sleep and higher burnout. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical survey (STROBE-reported) was conducted at the All-India Institute of Ayurveda (AIIA), New Delhi, during (January 2026 to July 2026), among 400 working adults aged 25-40 years with ≥1 year of occupational experience. A structured proforma captured sociodemographic details and Dinacharya-mapped digital behaviours across five domains (morning routine, bedtime device use, after-hours connectivity, screen breaks/sedentary time, mealtime practices). Sleep quality and burnout were assessed using the PSQI and Copenhagen burnout inventory. Results: Of 400 participants, 56.8% had poor sleep quality, 61% personal burnout, and 55.8% work-related burnout. Bedtime device use and inadequate screen breaks/sedentary behaviour independently predicted poor sleep (aOR 1.76 and 1.98). After-hours connectivity, sedentary behaviour, and mealtime digital engagement predicted personal burnout; bedtime device use, sedentary behaviour, mealtime digital engagement, and digital overload predicted work-related burnout (all p<0.05). Conclusions: Digital lifestyle behaviours reflect patterns of Pragyaparadha in daily digital conduct. Interpreted through Dinacharya and Nidra, the findings support a culturally grounded, preventive Digital Dinacharya framework for digital-era occupational health.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد

Childhood Emotional Neglect, Psychological Distress: Moderating role of Peer Support in Young Adults

Saba Noreen; Zarrin Atif International Journal of Emerging Multidisciplinaries Social Science, 2026, Vol. 5, Issue 6, pp. 18-45 https://doi.org/10.54938/ijemd-ss.2026.05.6.875

چکیده

Psychological distress during young adulthood may be influenced by early emotional experiences and current interpersonal relationships. The current study investigates the relationship between childhood emotional neglect, peer support and psychological distress in young adults. A quantitative research design was used with 200 participants aged 18-25 years selected through purposive sampling from educational institutions of Lahore. Childhood emotional neglect, peer support and psychological distress were measured with the Childhood Emotional Neglect Questionnaire (CENQ), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived social support (MSPSS), and Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), respectively. Data were analyzed using Pearson- product moment correlation, hierarchical regression, PROCESS moderation analysis and one way ANOVA. Childhood emotional neglect was significantly and positively associated with psychological distress while peer support was not significantly and directly associated with psychological distress. Hierarchical regression indicates that psychological distress was significantly predicted by childhood emotional neglect, while peer support was not a significant direct predictor. The regression model explained 12.5% of variance in psychological distress. Moderation analysis showed significant interaction effects of friends’ support (P= .017) and family support (P= .032), indicating that these sources of support moderated the relationship between childhood emotional neglect and psychological distress. There were significant socio-economic differences for childhood emotional and peer support, but not for psychological distress. The findings highlight the importance of considering childhood emotional experiences and interpersonal resources when understanding psychological distress among young adults.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد