فکر بنیانبانک مقالات روان‌شناسی
دسترسی آزاد پژوهشی داوری‌شده انگلیسی

The long shadow of social withdrawal: The impact of social withdrawal in adolescence on adult developmental outcomes – The TRAILS study

سایه بلند کناره‌گیری اجتماعی: تأثیر کناره‌گیری اجتماعی در نوجوانی بر پیامدهای تحولی بزرگسالی – مطالعه TRAILS

René Veenstra, Tina Kretschmer, Jardena Sturm, Albertine J. Oldehinkel

Development and Psychopathology 2026, pp. 1-13
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579426102004

ورود برای خواندن متن کاملبرای خواندن متن کامل وارد حساب فکر بنیان شوید.

چکیده

Abstract Social withdrawal in late childhood and adolescence is linked to long-term developmental challenges, yet its unique impact on adult adaptive functioning remains understudied. This TRAILS study ( N = 1,798 in the population cohort, M ( SD ) age at T1: 11.1 (0.6), 49% boys, 86.5% ethnically Dutch, M ( SD ) age at T7: 28.9 (0.6); N = 405 in the high-risk cohort, M ( SD ) age at T1: 11.1 (0.5), 66% boys, 97.6% ethnically Dutch, M ( SD ) age at T7: 29.6 (0.7)) examined whether social withdrawal during the ages of 11 to 16 predicted the achievement of developmental milestones by age 29, including romantic competence, residential autonomy, friendship satisfaction, work competence, and financial competence. Higher levels of social withdrawal consistently predicted lower likelihood of having achieved these milestones by age 29 (median OR = 0.76 in both cohorts), even after controlling for peer victimization, cognitive abilities, and family background measured in early adolescence. These effects were consistent across cohorts and gender. Sensitivity analyses that accounted for genetic confounding and clinical conditions (e.g., autism, depression) further supported the findings. These results highlight social withdrawal as a critical risk factor for developmental disadvantages, urging early interventions to foster social engagement and mitigate long-term maladjustment.

چکیده به فارسی

چکیده: کناره‌گیری اجتماعی در اواخر کودکی و نوجوانی با چالش‌های تحولی بلندمدت مرتبط است، اما تأثیر منحصر به‌فرد آن بر کارکرد سازشی بزرگسالان کمتر مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته است. این مطالعه TRAILS (تعداد نمونه در گروه جمعیتی = ۱٬۷۹۸، میانگین (انحراف معیار) سن در T1: ۱۱٫۱ (۰٫۶)، ۴۹٪ پسر، ۸۶٫۵٪ هلندی از نظر قومی، میانگین (انحراف معیار) سن در T7: ۲۸٫۹ (۰٫۶)؛ تعداد نمونه در گروه پرخطر = ۴۰۵، میانگین (انحراف معیار) سن در T1: ۱۱٫۱ (۰٫۵)، ۶۶٪ پسر، ۹۷٫۶٪ هلندی از نظر قومی، میانگین (انحراف معیار) سن در T7: ۲۹٫۶ (۰٫۷)) بررسی کرد که آیا کناره‌گیری اجتماعی در سنین ۱۱ تا ۱۶ سالگی می‌تواند پیش‌بینی‌کننده دستیابی به نقاط عطف تحولی تا سن ۲۹ سالگی باشد یا خیر، از جمله شایستگی عاشقانه، استقلال محل سکونت، رضایت از دوستی، شایستگی شغلی و شایستگی مالی. سطوح بالاتر کناره‌گیری اجتماعی به طور پیوسته احتمال دستیابی به این نقاط عطف تا سن ۲۹ سالگی را کاهش داد (میانه نسبت شانس = ۰٫۷۶ در هر دو گروه)، حتی پس از کنترل قربانی شدن توسط همسالان، توانایی‌های شناختی و پیشینه خانوادگی که در اوایل نوجوانی اندازه‌گیری شده بود. این اثرات در میان گروه‌ها و جنسیت‌ها ثابت بود. تحلیل‌های حساسیت که تأثیر عوامل ژنتیکی و شرایط بالینی (مانند اوتیسم، افسردگی) را نیز در نظر گرفت، یافته‌ها را بیشتر تأیید کرد. این نتایج کناره‌گیری اجتماعی را به عنوان یک عامل خطر مهم برای محرومیت‌های تحولی برجسته می‌کند و بر لزوم مداخلات زودهنگام برای تقویت تعامل اجتماعی و کاهش ناسازگاری بلندمدت تأکید دارد.

ترجمه‌ی خودکار برای آشنایی سریع؛ برای نقل و ارجاع، متن اصلی ملاک است.

موضوع‌ها و کلیدواژه‌ها

افسردگیاوتیسمشناختadolescencedevelopmental milestonesfinancial competencefriendship satisfactionpeer victimizationresidential autonomysocial withdrawalwork competence

ارجاع

Veenstra, R., Kretschmer, T., Sturm, J., & Oldehinkel, A. J. (2026). The long shadow of social withdrawal: The impact of social withdrawal in adolescence on adult developmental outcomes – The TRAILS study. Development and Psychopathology, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579426102004

(Veenstra et al., 2026)

دانلود BibTeX · دانلود RIS

گفت‌وگو

قوانین پرسش و گفتگو
  1. با احترام و بدون توهین، تحقیر، برچسب‌زنی یا حمله‌ی شخصی با دیگران گفتگو کنید.
  2. از نوشتن هرگونه اطلاعات هویتی یا قابل‌شناسایی مراجعان، بیماران یا اشخاص ثالث، از جمله نام، شماره‌ی تماس، تصویر، نشانی، محل کار یا جزئیات منحصربه‌فرد پرونده خودداری کنید.
  3. اگر درباره‌ی یک تجربه‌ی بالینی سؤال می‌کنید، اطلاعات را تا حد ممکن بی‌نام و کلی بیان کنید تا امکان شناسایی فرد وجود نداشته باشد.
  4. این بخش برای یادگیری و گفت‌وگوی علمی است و جایگزین ارزیابی، تشخیص، مشاوره یا روان‌درمانی شخصی نیست.
  5. در شرایط بحران یا خطر آسیب به خود یا دیگران، به این بخش اتکا نکنید و برای دریافت کمک فوری با اورژانس اجتماعی ۱۲۳ یا صدای مشاور بهزیستی ۱۴۸۰ تماس بگیرید.
  6. انتشار تبلیغات، معرفی خدمات شخصی، شماره‌ی تلفن، شناسه‌ی شبکه‌های اجتماعی، پیوند تبلیغاتی یا درخواست جذب مراجع در این بخش مجاز نیست.
  7. در بیان ادعاهای علمی، به‌ویژه درباره‌ی اثربخشی درمان‌ها، تشخیص یا یافته‌های پژوهشی، تا حد امکان نام منبع معتبر، مقاله یا راهنمای علمی را ذکر کنید.
  8. از ارائه‌ی تشخیص قطعی، تجویز درمان یا دارو و توصیه‌های بالینی شخصی به سایر کاربران خودداری کنید.
  9. پاسخ‌هایی که کارشناسان فکر بنیان می‌دهند با برچسب «پاسخ فکر بنیان» یا «کارشناس فکر بنیان» نمایش داده می‌شوند و سایر نوشته‌ها بیانگر نظر کاربران هستند.
  10. گزارش نوشته‌ی نامناسب: اگر نوشته‌ای حاوی نقض محرمانگی، محتوای آسیب‌زا، توهین، تبلیغ یا تخلف از این قوانین است، گزینه‌ی «گزارش» را انتخاب کنید تا تیم سایت بررسی کند.

برای پرسیدن و پاسخ دادن باید مشترک باشید. ورود

هنوز پرسشی منتشر نشده است.

مقاله‌های مرتبط

Awareness of Youth-Friendly Sexual and Reproductive Health Services among Undergraduate Students at Saint Augustine University of Tanzania, Mwanza, Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study

Frank Deus Samson; Paskas Wagana; Johnson Mavole International journal of social sciences and humanities review, 2026

چکیده

Background: Awareness of youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health services (YFSRHS) is an important starting point for enabling young people to identify and seek appropriate sexual and reproductive health information and care. However, awareness of these services may vary across settings, including higher education institutions. Objective: To determine the level of awareness of YFSRHS among undergraduate students at Saint Augustine University of Tanzania (SAUT), Malimbe Campus. Methods: A quantitative descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among undergraduate students at SAUT Malimbe Campus. Data were collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire. Of 109 questionnaires distributed, 108 completed questionnaires were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize students’ awareness and reported sources of information. Results: Of the 108 respondents, 96 (88.9%) reported having heard of YFSRHS, while 12 (11.1%) had not. Social media was the most frequently reported source of information (44.0%), followed by friends or peers (41.0%) and health facilities (36.0%). University programmes and posters or advertisements were reported less frequently. Conclusion: Most respondents had heard of YFSRHS, with social media and peer networks serving as prominent information channels. Strengthening accurate information through these channels, alongside university-based communication, may help address the awareness gap among students who remain unreached.

دسترسی آزاد

Different Forms of Religious Understanding

Jonathan Midkiff Societas Dei Jurnal Agama dan Masyarakat, 2026, Vol. 13, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.33550/sd.v13i1.611

چکیده

Religious education is often expected to promote tolerance, but respect for religious difference does not necessarily ensure accurate understanding of religious others. This study examines how religious education policies in Indonesia and England emphasize different forms of cognitive tolerance. Using qualitative document analysis and comparative policy analysis, the study analyzes selected legal, curricular, and pedagogical documents through four components: Knowledge of Religious Others, Recognition of Internal Diversity, Critical Reflection, and Understanding Commonalities and Differences. Indonesian policy gives greater relative emphasis to understanding commonalities and differences within religion-specific formation, social harmony, and responsible citizenship. English policy gives greater emphasis to critical reflection and knowledge of religious and non-religious worldviews through shared enquiry. Recognition of Internal Diversity appears in similar proportions in both datasets, but it serves different curricular functions. The findings show differently configured pathways toward cognitive tolerance, combining the same cognitive components with different relative emphases and curricular purposes.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد

Mediating Role of Loneliness in the Relationship Between Physical Activity Enjoyment and Mental Well-Being in Athletes

Emrah Seçer; Hasan Kuleli; Anıl Türkeli; Fatih Kaya International Journal of Disabilities Sports & Health Sciences, 2026, Vol. 9, Issue 4, pp. 251-265 https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.1974940

چکیده

Although physical activity enjoyment is associated with athletes’ psychological outcomes, the mechanisms underlying its relationship with mental well-being remain unclear. This study examined the mediating role of loneliness among athletes. A correlational survey design was employed. The participants consisted of 350 athletes selected through criterion sampling, including 178 females (Mage= 20.58 ± 1.99) and 172 males (Mage= 21.91 ± 4.88). Data were collected using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale, UCLA Loneliness Scale–Short Form, and Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale. Pearson correlation analysis and PROCESS Macro Model 4 mediation analysis were conducted, and indirect effects were tested using 5,000 bootstrap samples. Physical activity enjoyment was positively associated with mental well-being (r= .586, p< .01) and negatively associated with loneliness (a= −.196, p< .01). Loneliness was negatively associated with mental well-being (b= −.447, p< .01). The mediation analysis revealed a significant indirect effect of physical activity enjoyment on mental well-being through loneliness (indirect effect= .088, 95% CI [.026, .147]). These findings indicate that enjoyment of physical activity contributes to athletes’ mental well-being and that loneliness partially explains this relationship. The results emphasize the importance of considering social connectedness and psychological experiences in understanding athletes’ well-being.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد

Interpersonal Stressors and Adolescent Mental Health During COVID-19: Investigating the Role of Loneliness

Atina Manvelian; Erica Marie Szkody; Katherine A Cohen; Jessica Lee Schleider Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 2026 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-026-02113-4

چکیده

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic created social disruptions, leading to high levels of mental health problems for adolescents. Interpersonal stressors, such as lack of familial support, peer victimization, and discrimination, may have further exacerbated teen mental health issues. Yet, the psychological impact of interpersonal stressors and their interactive effects with high levels of loneliness remains unknown. In this pre-registered study , conducted in November and December 2020 (approximately eight months into the COVID-19 pandemic), we used a diverse sample of adolescents from across 43 U.S. states with elevated depressive symptoms (n = 2,452, ages 13–16) to examine how familial support, peer victimization, and discrimination are concurrently associated with mental health outcomes. Results indicated that perceived discrimination was the strongest standardized correlate across continuous internalizing outcomes (depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and hopelessness), whereas lack of familial support was the primary correlate of suicidal ideation; if youth reported a lack of familial support, they were over three times as likely to report suicidal ideation. Loneliness significantly moderated the cross-sectional links between lack of familial support and depressive symptoms, as well as perceived discrimination and hopelessness. Simple slope probing demonstrated a distress ceiling effect: interpersonal stressors were most strongly associated with elevated distress among youth reporting low baseline loneliness, whereas youth experiencing high loneliness exhibited consistently elevated distress regardless of stressor exposure. These findings underscore interpersonal stressors and loneliness as high-priority targets for youth prevention and intervention programs, particularly during periods of widespread social disruption.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد