متن کامل این مقاله در فکر بنیان نیست؛ مشخصات و چکیده را میبینید و متن کامل را میتوانید از طریق DOI در سایت ناشر بخوانید.صفحهی مقاله در سایت ناشر ↗
چکیده
Background Symptom catastrophizing reflects maladaptive cognitive and emotional responses to physical symptoms and may worsen symptom burden, distress, and recovery. However, no validated Chinese instrument is available for cardiac surgery patients, limiting patient-centered assessment and early risk identification.Objective To translate and culturally adapt a symptom-neutral catastrophizing measure derived from the original Post-concussion Symptom Catastrophizing Scale and evaluate its psychometric properties in Chinese cardiac surgery patients.Methods Following Brislin’s translation model, the scale was translated into Chinese. A convenience sample of 676 cardiac surgery patients was recruited from June to October 2025. Item analysis included critical ratio testing, item-total correlations, and internal consistency evaluation. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency, split-half, and test-retest methods. Content validity was evaluated through expert consultation. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to examine construct validity. Data were analyzed using SPSS 29.0 and Mplus 8.0.Results The adapted Chinese Symptom Catastrophizing Scale demonstrated strong content validity in cardiac surgery patients (S-CVI/Ave = 0.975; CVR = 0.800–1.000). Exploratory factor analysis extracted a three-factor model explaining 79.774% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated acceptable model fit (χ2/df = 2.175, CFI = 0.970, TLI = 0.962, RMSEA = 0.059). Reliability coefficients included Cronbach’s α = 0.936, split-half reliability = 0.894, test-retest reliability = 0.958, and McDonald’s ω = 0.934.Conclusion The Chinese Symptom Catastrophizing Scale demonstrated satisfactory initial reliability and validity evidence in cardiac surgery patients. It provides a brief, standardized, patient-centered measure for identifying maladaptive symptom responses and may facilitate early psychological risk screening, targeted symptom management, and future patient-reported outcome research.
چکیده به فارسی
زمینه و هدف: فاجعهسازی نشانهها بازتابدهنده پاسخهای شناختی و هیجانی ناسازگار به نشانههای جسمانی است و ممکن است بار نشانهها، پریشانی و روند بهبودی را تشدید کند. با این حال، هیچ ابزار معتبر به زبان چینی برای بیماران جراحی قلب وجود ندارد و این امر ارزیابی مبتنی بر بیمار و شناسایی زودهنگام خطر را محدود میکند. هدف: ترجمه و بومیسازی فرهنگی یک ابزار خنثی نسبت به نشانهها که از مقیاس اصلی فاجعهسازی نشانههای پس از ضربه مغزی اقتباس شده و ارزیابی ویژگیهای روانسنجی آن در بیماران چینی جراحی قلب بود. روشها: با پیروی از مدل ترجمه Brislin، مقیاس به زبان چینی ترجمه شد. نمونهگیری در دسترس شامل ۶۷۶ بیمار جراحی قلب از ژوئن تا اکتبر ۲۰۲۵ بود. تحلیل مادهها شامل آزمون نسبت بحرانی، همبستگی ماده-کل و ارزیابی انسجام درونی بود. پایایی با استفاده از انسجام درونی، روش دو نیمه و آزمون بازآزمایی سنجیده شد. روایی محتوا از طریق مشاوره با خبرگان ارزیابی شد. برای بررسی روایی سازه، تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و تأییدی انجام شد. دادهها با استفاده از SPSS 29.0 و Mplus 8.0 تحلیل شدند. یافتهها: مقیاس فاجعهسازی نشانهها به زبان چینی روایی محتوای قوی در بیماران جراحی قلب نشان داد (S-CVI/Ave = 0.975؛ CVR = 0.800–1.000). تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی سه عامل استخراج کرد که ۷۹.۷۷۴٪ واریانس را تبیین نمود. تحلیل عاملی تأییدی برازش قابل قبول مدل را نشان داد (χ2/df = 2.175، CFI = 0.970، TLI = 0.962، RMSEA = 0.059). ضرایب پایایی شامل آلفای کرونباخ = 0.936، پایایی دو نیمه = 0.894، پایایی بازآزمایی = 0.958 و اومگای مکدونالد = 0.934 بود. نتیجهگیری: مقیاس فاجعهسازی نشانهها به زبان چینی شواهد اولیه رضایتبخشی از نظر پایایی و روایی در بیماران جراحی قلب ارائه داد. این ابزار، مقیاسی مختصر، استاندارد و مبتنی بر بیمار برای شناسایی پاسخهای ناسازگار به نشانهها فراهم میکند و میتواند غربالگری زودهنگام خطر روانشناختی، مدیریت هدفمند نشانهها و پژوهشهای آتی مبتنی بر پیامدهای گزارششده توسط بیمار را تسهیل نماید.
ترجمهی خودکار برای آشنایی سریع؛ برای نقل و ارجاع، متن اصلی ملاک است.
Zhang, D., Zheng, H., Cheng, W., Yang, Y., Yang, F., & Zhou, Y. (2026). Translation and psychometric validation of the symptom catastrophizing scale in cardiac surgery patients: a cross-sectional study. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2026.2744739
با احترام و بدون توهین، تحقیر، برچسبزنی یا حملهی شخصی با دیگران گفتگو کنید.
از نوشتن هرگونه اطلاعات هویتی یا قابلشناسایی مراجعان، بیماران یا اشخاص ثالث، از جمله نام، شمارهی تماس، تصویر، نشانی، محل کار یا جزئیات منحصربهفرد پرونده خودداری کنید.
اگر دربارهی یک تجربهی بالینی سؤال میکنید، اطلاعات را تا حد ممکن بینام و کلی بیان کنید تا امکان شناسایی فرد وجود نداشته باشد.
این بخش برای یادگیری و گفتوگوی علمی است و جایگزین ارزیابی، تشخیص، مشاوره یا رواندرمانی شخصی نیست.
در شرایط بحران یا خطر آسیب به خود یا دیگران، به این بخش اتکا نکنید و برای دریافت کمک فوری با اورژانس اجتماعی ۱۲۳ یا صدای مشاور بهزیستی ۱۴۸۰ تماس بگیرید.
انتشار تبلیغات، معرفی خدمات شخصی، شمارهی تلفن، شناسهی شبکههای اجتماعی، پیوند تبلیغاتی یا درخواست جذب مراجع در این بخش مجاز نیست.
در بیان ادعاهای علمی، بهویژه دربارهی اثربخشی درمانها، تشخیص یا یافتههای پژوهشی، تا حد امکان نام منبع معتبر، مقاله یا راهنمای علمی را ذکر کنید.
از ارائهی تشخیص قطعی، تجویز درمان یا دارو و توصیههای بالینی شخصی به سایر کاربران خودداری کنید.
پاسخهایی که کارشناسان فکر بنیان میدهند با برچسب «پاسخ فکر بنیان» یا «کارشناس فکر بنیان» نمایش داده میشوند و سایر نوشتهها بیانگر نظر کاربران هستند.
گزارش نوشتهی نامناسب: اگر نوشتهای حاوی نقض محرمانگی، محتوای آسیبزا، توهین، تبلیغ یا تخلف از این قوانین است، گزینهی «گزارش» را انتخاب کنید تا تیم سایت بررسی کند.
Background: Awareness of youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health services (YFSRHS) is an important starting point for enabling young people to identify and seek appropriate sexual and reproductive health information and care. However, awareness of these services may vary across settings, including higher education institutions. Objective: To determine the level of awareness of YFSRHS among undergraduate students at Saint Augustine University of Tanzania (SAUT), Malimbe Campus. Methods: A quantitative descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among undergraduate students at SAUT Malimbe Campus. Data were collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire. Of 109 questionnaires distributed, 108 completed questionnaires were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize students’ awareness and reported sources of information. Results: Of the 108 respondents, 96 (88.9%) reported having heard of YFSRHS, while 12 (11.1%) had not. Social media was the most frequently reported source of information (44.0%), followed by friends or peers (41.0%) and health facilities (36.0%). University programmes and posters or advertisements were reported less frequently. Conclusion: Most respondents had heard of YFSRHS, with social media and peer networks serving as prominent information channels. Strengthening accurate information through these channels, alongside university-based communication, may help address the awareness gap among students who remain unreached.
Religious education is often expected to promote tolerance, but respect for religious difference does not necessarily ensure accurate understanding of religious others. This study examines how religious education policies in Indonesia and England emphasize different forms of cognitive tolerance. Using qualitative document analysis and comparative policy analysis, the study analyzes selected legal, curricular, and pedagogical documents through four components: Knowledge of Religious Others, Recognition of Internal Diversity, Critical Reflection, and Understanding Commonalities and Differences. Indonesian policy gives greater relative emphasis to understanding commonalities and differences within religion-specific formation, social harmony, and responsible citizenship. English policy gives greater emphasis to critical reflection and knowledge of religious and non-religious worldviews through shared enquiry. Recognition of Internal Diversity appears in similar proportions in both datasets, but it serves different curricular functions. The findings show differently configured pathways toward cognitive tolerance, combining the same cognitive components with different relative emphases and curricular purposes.
ABSTRACT Introduction Anxiety is central to the psychotherapy process, yet psychotherapists routinely infer a client's anxiety intensity from observable behaviour rather than from formal measurement, with no widely accepted framework to organise which observable markers indicate which levels of anxiety. This exploratory study examined how therapists make such classifications. Method Ninety‐one mental health professionals were randomly assigned to classify 41 text‐described behavioural and physiological markers using either a 5‐level or a simplified 3‐level category system, both derived from an integrated model of state anxiety in psychotherapy. Results Response distributions departed significantly from uniformity for nearly all markers in both formats, and the rank ordering of markers by intensity was highly consistent across formats, suggesting that therapists may share broad intuitions about relative marker intensity. Which markers elicited agreement, however, was far less reproducible, depending substantially on the response format. Convergence also depended on where the agreement criterion was set, declining from 90.2% to 51.2% of markers in the 3‐level format and from 63.4% to 22.0% in the 5‐level format as the criterion rose from > 0.50 to > 0.70. The 3‐level format yielded more classifiable markers at every criterion, although this advantage was not consistent across indices, whereas the 5‐level format elicited fewer ‘Insufficient to Determine’ responses. Markers placed at the highest intensity levels were classified most consistently. Discussion These findings offer preliminary groundwork for research on marker operationalisation, contextualised rating tasks and the development of training materials for psychotherapy process research.
Although physical activity enjoyment is associated with athletes’ psychological outcomes, the mechanisms underlying its relationship with mental well-being remain unclear. This study examined the mediating role of loneliness among athletes. A correlational survey design was employed. The participants consisted of 350 athletes selected through criterion sampling, including 178 females (Mage= 20.58 ± 1.99) and 172 males (Mage= 21.91 ± 4.88). Data were collected using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale, UCLA Loneliness Scale–Short Form, and Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale. Pearson correlation analysis and PROCESS Macro Model 4 mediation analysis were conducted, and indirect effects were tested using 5,000 bootstrap samples. Physical activity enjoyment was positively associated with mental well-being (r= .586, p< .01) and negatively associated with loneliness (a= −.196, p< .01). Loneliness was negatively associated with mental well-being (b= −.447, p< .01). The mediation analysis revealed a significant indirect effect of physical activity enjoyment on mental well-being through loneliness (indirect effect= .088, 95% CI [.026, .147]). These findings indicate that enjoyment of physical activity contributes to athletes’ mental well-being and that loneliness partially explains this relationship. The results emphasize the importance of considering social connectedness and psychological experiences in understanding athletes’ well-being.
Student engagement positively influences academic achievement, yet instruments suited to the Indonesian cultural context remain limited. This study aimed to develop a valid, reliable, and user-friendly student engagement scale for high school students. Using a quantitative descriptive design, the study involved 295 male and female students aged 15–18 years recruited through convenience sampling. The scale comprised three dimensions: behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement. The results showed that the scale demonstrated a good model fit based on the goodness-of-fit indices (χ2/df = 1.60; CFI = 0.966; TLI = 0.962; SRMR = 0.074; RMSEA = 0.045) and good reliability, with Cronbach’s alpha values of 0.844 for emotional engagement, 0.753 for behavioral engagement, and 0.782 for cognitive engagement. The developed scale can be used by teachers, counselors, and educational researchers to identify students’ levels of engagement and inform the development of programs to improve student engagement.