Bryson Daudi Kinyaduka

Abstract: This paper develops an Implementation Framework as a response to the informal feedback from academics, educators and practitioners on the Multiplicity Theory. The claim the paper responds is that the theory is too abstract; thus, it is difficult to translate it into practice. This paper provides clarification to assist its adoption in education and other fields. We believe the illustrations provided in this paper will be helpful to those interested in applying the Theory in education and other fields. The paper compares the current Implementation Framework with other closely related frameworks. The paper concludes to be able to apply the theory an advanced consideration of sub-activities, aspects and resources among others is helpful in bridging theory-practice gap during implementation of a plan. As a result, we ensure quality of educational activities or products (outcomes). The implication of the framework is stakeholders should understand educational events/products (outcomes) are not from a single process, aspect and resources, but a function of a diversity of the same (processes, aspects and resources).