فکر بنیانبانک مقالات روان‌شناسی

feasibility and acceptability

همهٔ آثار این مفهوم در فکر بنیان

Feasibility and acceptability of a mindfulness-based vitality promotion program in a lifelong learning setting: a single-arm mixed-methods study

Seok-In Yoon; Hui-Yeong Park; Jae-Hong Yoo; Sun-Yong Chung; Jong-Nam Kim Frontiers in Public Health, 2026, Vol. 14, pp. 1990679 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1990679

چکیده

Background As global aging accelerates, age-related psychophysiological conditions have emerged as major public health concerns. Promoting and sustaining vitality, an inherent human capacity, is essential for healthy aging and long-term well-being. The Mindfulness-based Vitality Promotion (MVP) program is a mindfulness-based behavioral intervention designed to enhance physical and psychological vitality and support sustainable well-being. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the MVP program and explored preliminary pre–post changes in health-related outcomes among community-dwelling individuals in a lifelong learning setting. Methods This study employed a single-arm mixed-methods design. A total of 35 participants were recruited for this study. The MVP program was delivered over 8 weeks, with each session lasting 90 min. Quantitative data were collected through self-report questionnaires, and qualitative data were obtained via semi-structured interviews. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed based on program retention, session attendance, and participant satisfaction. Results Quantitative analysis revealed significant pre–post increases in integrative vitality and well-being, along with significant reductions in depression, fatigue, and anxiety. No statistically significant changes were observed in pain, sleep disturbance, digestive symptoms, anger, or mindfulness. Of the 35 enrolled participants, 31 completed the program (88.6%), with a mean attendance of 6.37 of eight sessions. Among the 30 satisfaction survey respondents, 28 (93.3%) indicated willingness to participate again and 30 (100%) indicated willingness to recommend the program to others. The qualitative analysis identified four major themes: (i) diverse life challenges and self-care needs, (ii) learning through experience, connection, and application, (iii) regaining balance and agency in life, and (iv) sustaining practice requires continued support. Conclusion Mixed-methods findings provide preliminary information regarding the feasibility and acceptability of the MVP program and indicate favorable pre–post changes in several self-reported health-related outcomes. The MVP program may represent a practical lifelong learning intervention with potential relevance for public health promotion. Further controlled studies are warranted to establish its efficacy. Trial registration The trial was first submitted to the Clinical Research Information Service, Republic of Korea (KCT0009961, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=28524&search_page=L ), on October 8, 2024, before participant enrollment began, and registration was finalized on November 28, 2024.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد

Problem management plus with emotional processing module for refugee youth in the Netherlands: pilot trial of feasibility, acceptability and safety

مدیریت مسئله به‌همراه ماژول پردازش هیجانی برای جوانان پناهنده در هلند: مطالعه‌ی آزمایشی امکان‌سنجی، پذیرش و ایمنی

Cansu Alözkan; Pim Cuijpers; Ellenor Mittendorfer‐Rutz; Aemal Akhtar; Richard Allan Bryant; Katie S Dawson; … BJPsych Open, 2026, Vol. 12, Issue 6, pp. e262 https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.12122

چکیده

Background Refugee youth are at elevated risk for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other mental health disorders, yet systemic and cultural barriers limit access to care. Scalable, transdiagnostic interventions such as Problem Management Plus (PM+) are promising, but their impact on trauma symptoms is modest. Incorporating brief trauma-focused components may enhance effectiveness. Aims To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of PM+ with an emotional processing module (PM+EP) for refugee youth aged 16–25 years in the Netherlands. Method Refugee youth with elevated psychological distress (K10 > 15) and impaired functioning (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) > 16) were randomised into PM+EP, PM+ with supportive counselling (PM+SC), or care as usual (CAU). Feasibility and acceptability were assessed via recruitment, adherence, fidelity and qualitative interviews. Psychological distress, PTSD symptoms, functioning and self-identified problems were measured at baseline, post-intervention and follow-up. Registered in Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands (OMON; Trial ID: NL-OMON56254). Results Fifty-two participants were randomised (PM+EP: n = 17; PM+SC: n = 19; CAU: n = 16). Attendance and fidelity were high, and PM+ interventions were rated as acceptable and culturally appropriate. No significant between-group differences were observed in the primary analyses. Exploratory analyses suggested greater short-term symptom reduction for probable depression in PM+EP versus CAU ( b = –0.79, s.e. = 0.38, p = 0.04). Effect size estimates ranged from small to large across outcomes (Hedges’ g = –0.98 to 0.19). Conclusions PM+ is feasible, acceptable and safe for refugee youth aged 16 years and older. The potential added value of the EP module remains unclear and warrants further investigation. Trial Registration Number The trial was registered in the Dutch clinical trial registration: Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands (OMON) (Trial ID: NL-OMON56254; https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/56254 ).

زمینه: جوانان پناهنده در معرض خطر بالاتر ابتلا به اختلال استرس پس از سانحه (PTSD) و سایر اختلالات سلامت روان قرار دارند، اما موانع نظام‌مند و فرهنگی دسترسی به مراقبت را محدود می‌کند. مداخلات مقیاس‌پذیر و فراتشخیصی مانند مدیریت مسئله پلاس (PM+) امیدبخش هستند، اما تأثیر آن‌ها بر علائم تروما متوسط است. افزودن مؤلفه‌های کوتاه‌مدت متمرکز بر تروما ممکن است اثربخشی را افزایش دهد. اهداف: ارزیابی امکان‌سنجی و پذیرش مدیریت مسئله پلاس به‌همراه ماژول پردازش هیجانی (PM+EP) برای جوانان پناهنده ۱۶ تا ۲۵ ساله در هلند. روش: جوانان پناهنده با پریشانی روان‌شناختی بالا (K10 > 15) و اختلال عملکرد (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) > 16) به‌صورت تصادفی در گروه‌های PM+EP، PM+ به‌همراه مشاوره حمایتی (PM+SC)، یا مراقبت معمول (CAU) قرار گرفتند. امکان‌سنجی و پذیرش از طریق جذب، پایبندی، وفاداری و مصاحبه‌های کیفی ارزیابی شد. پریشانی روان‌شناختی، علائم PTSD، عملکرد و مشکلات شناسایی‌شده توسط خود شرکت‌کنندگان در خط پایه، پس از مداخله و پیگیری اندازه‌گیری شد. این مطالعه در سامانه‌ی Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands (OMON؛ شماره‌ی کارآزمایی: NL-OMON56254) ثبت شده است. نتایج: پنجاه‌ودو شرکت‌کننده به‌صورت تصادفی تخصیص یافتند (PM+EP: n = 17؛ PM+SC: n = 19؛ CAU: n = 16). حضور و وفاداری بالا بود و مداخلات PM+ به‌عنوان قابل پذیرش و مناسب از نظر فرهنگی ارزیابی شدند. در تحلیل‌های اصلی، تفاوت معناداری بین گروه‌ها مشاهده نشد. تحلیل‌های اکتشافی کاهش علائم کوتاه‌مدت بیشتر برای افسردگی محتمل در گروه PM+EP نسبت به CAU را نشان داد (b = –0.79، s.e. = 0.38، p = 0.04). برآوردهای اندازه‌ی اثر در نتایج مختلف از کوچک تا بزرگ متغیر بود (Hedges’ g = –0.98 تا 0.19). نتیجه‌گیری: PM+ برای جوانان پناهنده ۱۶ ساله و بالاتر امکان‌پذیر، قابل پذیرش و ایمن است. ارزش افزوده‌ی بالقوه‌ی ماژول EP همچنان نامشخص است و نیازمند بررسی بیشتر می‌باشد. شماره‌ی ثبت کارآزمایی: این کارآزمایی در ثبت کارآزمایی بالینی هلند: Overview of Medical Research in the Netherlands (OMON) (شماره‌ی کارآزمایی: NL-OMON56254؛ https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/56254 ) ثبت شده است.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد