Effects of Interpersonal Traumatic Experiences and Interpersonal Problems on Psychological Symptoms among College Students: Moderated Mediating Effect of Expressive Flexibility
تأثیرات تجارب آسیبزای بینفردی و مشکلات بینفردی بر علائم روانشناختی در دانشجویان: اثر میانجیگری تعدیلشده انعطافپذیری در ابراز هیجانی
Background: This study examined whether interpersonal problems mediated the relationship between subjective distress from interpersonal trauma and psychological symptoms, and whether emotional expression flexibility moderated this indirect effect.Methods: Self-reported measures were completed by 241 college students with interpersonal trauma experiences. Data were analyzed using correlation, mediation, and moderated mediation analyses. PROCESS Macro for SPSS was used.Results: Interpersonal problems partially mediated the relationship between interpersonal trauma-related distress and psychological symptoms. Furthermore, emotional expression enhancement significantly moderated the association between interpersonal trauma-related distress and problems; conversely, emotional expression suppression did not. The indirect effect through interpersonal problems was significant only at low and average levels of emotional expression enhancement.Conclusions: Emotional expression enhancement may buffer the negative effects of interpersonal trauma on interpersonal problems and psychological symptoms. These findings suggest that interventions for enhancing context-appropriate emotional expression may be useful for college students with interpersonal trauma experiences.
چکیده به فارسی
زمینه: این پژوهش بررسی کرد که آیا مشکلات بینفردی رابطه بین پریشانی ذهنی ناشی از آسیب بینفردی و علائم روانشناختی را میانجیگری میکند و آیا انعطافپذیری در ابراز هیجانی این اثر غیرمستقیم را تعدیل میکند. روشها: ابزارهای خودگزارشی توسط ۲۴۱ دانشجو با تجربه آسیب بینفردی تکمیل شد. دادهها با استفاده از تحلیل همبستگی، میانجیگری و میانجیگری تعدیلشده تحلیل گردید. برای تحلیلها از PROCESS Macro در SPSS استفاده شد. یافتهها: مشکلات بینفردی رابطه بین پریشانی مرتبط با آسیب بینفردی و علائم روانشناختی را بهطور جزئی میانجیگری کرد. علاوه بر این، افزایش ابراز هیجانی بهطور معناداری رابطه بین پریشانی مرتبط با آسیب بینفردی و مشکلات را تعدیل کرد؛ در حالی که سرکوب ابراز هیجانی چنین اثری نداشت. اثر غیرمستقیم از طریق مشکلات بینفردی فقط در سطوح پایین و متوسط افزایش ابراز هیجانی معنادار بود. نتیجهگیری: افزایش ابراز هیجانی ممکن است اثرات منفی آسیب بینفردی بر مشکلات بینفردی و علائم روانشناختی را کاهش دهد. این یافتهها نشان میدهد که مداخلات برای تقویت ابراز هیجانی متناسب با زمینه میتواند برای دانشجویان با تجربه آسیب بینفردی مفید باشد.
ترجمهی خودکار برای آشنایی سریع؛ برای نقل و ارجاع، متن اصلی ملاک است.
Lim, H., & Kim, B. (2026). Effects of Interpersonal Traumatic Experiences and Interpersonal Problems on Psychological Symptoms among College Students: Moderated Mediating Effect of Expressive Flexibility. Korean Journal of Stress Research, 34(3), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.17547/kjsr.2026.34.3.165
با احترام و بدون توهین، تحقیر، برچسبزنی یا حملهی شخصی با دیگران گفتگو کنید.
از نوشتن هرگونه اطلاعات هویتی یا قابلشناسایی مراجعان، بیماران یا اشخاص ثالث، از جمله نام، شمارهی تماس، تصویر، نشانی، محل کار یا جزئیات منحصربهفرد پرونده خودداری کنید.
اگر دربارهی یک تجربهی بالینی سؤال میکنید، اطلاعات را تا حد ممکن بینام و کلی بیان کنید تا امکان شناسایی فرد وجود نداشته باشد.
این بخش برای یادگیری و گفتوگوی علمی است و جایگزین ارزیابی، تشخیص، مشاوره یا رواندرمانی شخصی نیست.
در شرایط بحران یا خطر آسیب به خود یا دیگران، به این بخش اتکا نکنید و برای دریافت کمک فوری با اورژانس اجتماعی ۱۲۳ یا صدای مشاور بهزیستی ۱۴۸۰ تماس بگیرید.
انتشار تبلیغات، معرفی خدمات شخصی، شمارهی تلفن، شناسهی شبکههای اجتماعی، پیوند تبلیغاتی یا درخواست جذب مراجع در این بخش مجاز نیست.
در بیان ادعاهای علمی، بهویژه دربارهی اثربخشی درمانها، تشخیص یا یافتههای پژوهشی، تا حد امکان نام منبع معتبر، مقاله یا راهنمای علمی را ذکر کنید.
از ارائهی تشخیص قطعی، تجویز درمان یا دارو و توصیههای بالینی شخصی به سایر کاربران خودداری کنید.
پاسخهایی که کارشناسان فکر بنیان میدهند با برچسب «پاسخ فکر بنیان» یا «کارشناس فکر بنیان» نمایش داده میشوند و سایر نوشتهها بیانگر نظر کاربران هستند.
گزارش نوشتهی نامناسب: اگر نوشتهای حاوی نقض محرمانگی، محتوای آسیبزا، توهین، تبلیغ یا تخلف از این قوانین است، گزینهی «گزارش» را انتخاب کنید تا تیم سایت بررسی کند.
Background: Awareness of youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health services (YFSRHS) is an important starting point for enabling young people to identify and seek appropriate sexual and reproductive health information and care. However, awareness of these services may vary across settings, including higher education institutions. Objective: To determine the level of awareness of YFSRHS among undergraduate students at Saint Augustine University of Tanzania (SAUT), Malimbe Campus. Methods: A quantitative descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among undergraduate students at SAUT Malimbe Campus. Data were collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire. Of 109 questionnaires distributed, 108 completed questionnaires were included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize students’ awareness and reported sources of information. Results: Of the 108 respondents, 96 (88.9%) reported having heard of YFSRHS, while 12 (11.1%) had not. Social media was the most frequently reported source of information (44.0%), followed by friends or peers (41.0%) and health facilities (36.0%). University programmes and posters or advertisements were reported less frequently. Conclusion: Most respondents had heard of YFSRHS, with social media and peer networks serving as prominent information channels. Strengthening accurate information through these channels, alongside university-based communication, may help address the awareness gap among students who remain unreached.
Quality higher education plays a vital role in sustainable development by equipping graduates with knowledge, competencies, and skills required for economic and societal development. This study examined the relationship between instructional strategies and the employability skills of undergraduate students in the School of Art and Industrial Design at Kyambogo University, Uganda. Specifically, it investigated the relationships between cooperative teaching, collaborative teaching, inquiry/discovery learning, independent study, experiential (authentic) learning, project-based learning, and students’ employability skills. The study adopted a quantitative approach using a correlational research design. Data were collected from 378 third-year undergraduate students using a structured self-administered questionnaire. Pearson’s product-moment correlation and multiple regression analyses were used to determine the direction and statistical associations between instructional strategies and employability skills. Findings showed that cooperative teaching, inquiry/discovery learning, and experiential teaching had positive statistically significant associations with employability skills, whereas collaborative teaching had a negative statistical association. Independent study and project-based teaching had no statistically significant unique associations with employability skills. Inquiry/discovery teaching demonstrated the strongest statistical association with employability skills among the strategies examined. The study concluded that instructional strategies had different statistical associations with employability skills and that learner-centred approaches are most beneficial when they actively engage students in cooperative, inquiry-oriented, and authentic learning experiences aligned with intended graduate outcomes. The study recommended strengthening cooperative, inquiry, and experiential teaching through structured group tasks, inquiry-based activities, and authentic practical experiences. It further recommended improving the design and implementation of collaborative, independent, and project-based learning to enhance their contribution to graduate employability skills.
Over the last decade, there has been a visible surge of students participating in and leading different forms of activism. Following the cultural reckoning of 2020, the United States saw a rise in awareness and engagement in activism among young individuals. Continuing this trend, higher education institutions have seen an increase in on-campus demonstrations in recent years. Given the recent increase in activism, political engagement, and the globalization of social issues, this study examined how attitudes, beliefs, individual factors, and prior behaviors relate to undergraduate students’ willingness to engage in different forms of activism (i.e., conventional and high-risk). Across both forms of activism, institutional advocacy (i.e., the behavioral targeting of institutional racism) was the most consistent unique predictor of a student's willingness to engage in activism. Need for cognition and individual advocacy were significantly and positively related to conventional activism, whereas political orientation was negatively related to it. Social justice orientation was significantly and negatively related to high-risk activism.
This study addresses the critical deficiency in speaking skills among university students, a challenge primarily attributed to the reliance on traditional teaching methods and the limited time allocated for authentic verbal practice within the classroom. The research aims to construct a comprehensive theoretical framework for the Flipped Classroom strategy and identify the pedagogical and linguistic justifications for its implementation in developing speaking skills, while providing practical procedural recommendations for its integration into higher education. Adopting a descriptive-analytical approach through a critical review of educational literature, the findings reveal that the flipped model significantly enhances students' fluency, linguistic accuracy, and capacity for spontaneous expression. Furthermore, the model fosters increased motivation and active participation by granting learners the autonomy to progress at their own pace, as pre-class preparation helps mitigate "language anxiety" and bolsters confidence during real-time communicative interactions. Despite these advantages, the research identifies several implementation challenges, most notably the digital divide, potential cognitive overload, and the necessity for intensive faculty training in digital instructional design. Ultimately, the study concludes that the Flipped Classroom represents a fundamental philosophical shift that redefines educational roles, transforming class time from passive instruction into a dynamic "living linguistic laboratory" focused on intensive communicative practice.
The purpose of this research is to analyze the economic self-management strategies used by students of the Faculty of Business Sciences of the Technical University of Machala during their academic training; Interest in this study arose from the need to understand how students face economic difficulties that arise in their training. A mixed approach was applied and a survey was used on a representative sample of 367 students, identifying the main source of income for a part of the student population, evidencing alternatives to sustain their expenses and reduce their economic dependence. The most used strategies were observed when they go through difficult situations and if the income is sufficient to cover their expenses, reflecting the existence of limitations and conditioning the way of organizing their resources and decision making. Likewise, it was identified that students usually perceive an impact. in their academic performance. The results allowed us to understand the economic dynamics experienced by university students and provide information for the design of institutional strategies that contribute to strengthening permanence, well-being and academic success.