فکر بنیانبانک مقالات روان‌شناسی

self-reported health

همهٔ آثار این مفهوم در فکر بنیان

Feasibility and acceptability of a mindfulness-based vitality promotion program in a lifelong learning setting: a single-arm mixed-methods study

Seok-In Yoon; Hui-Yeong Park; Jae-Hong Yoo; Sun-Yong Chung; Jong-Nam Kim Frontiers in Public Health, 2026, Vol. 14, pp. 1990679 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1990679

چکیده

Background As global aging accelerates, age-related psychophysiological conditions have emerged as major public health concerns. Promoting and sustaining vitality, an inherent human capacity, is essential for healthy aging and long-term well-being. The Mindfulness-based Vitality Promotion (MVP) program is a mindfulness-based behavioral intervention designed to enhance physical and psychological vitality and support sustainable well-being. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the MVP program and explored preliminary pre–post changes in health-related outcomes among community-dwelling individuals in a lifelong learning setting. Methods This study employed a single-arm mixed-methods design. A total of 35 participants were recruited for this study. The MVP program was delivered over 8 weeks, with each session lasting 90 min. Quantitative data were collected through self-report questionnaires, and qualitative data were obtained via semi-structured interviews. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed based on program retention, session attendance, and participant satisfaction. Results Quantitative analysis revealed significant pre–post increases in integrative vitality and well-being, along with significant reductions in depression, fatigue, and anxiety. No statistically significant changes were observed in pain, sleep disturbance, digestive symptoms, anger, or mindfulness. Of the 35 enrolled participants, 31 completed the program (88.6%), with a mean attendance of 6.37 of eight sessions. Among the 30 satisfaction survey respondents, 28 (93.3%) indicated willingness to participate again and 30 (100%) indicated willingness to recommend the program to others. The qualitative analysis identified four major themes: (i) diverse life challenges and self-care needs, (ii) learning through experience, connection, and application, (iii) regaining balance and agency in life, and (iv) sustaining practice requires continued support. Conclusion Mixed-methods findings provide preliminary information regarding the feasibility and acceptability of the MVP program and indicate favorable pre–post changes in several self-reported health-related outcomes. The MVP program may represent a practical lifelong learning intervention with potential relevance for public health promotion. Further controlled studies are warranted to establish its efficacy. Trial registration The trial was first submitted to the Clinical Research Information Service, Republic of Korea (KCT0009961, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=28524&search_page=L ), on October 8, 2024, before participant enrollment began, and registration was finalized on November 28, 2024.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد

Reassessing cardiometabolic health disparities among young adult sexual minority women: Evidence from a population-based cohort

بازنگری نابرابری‌های سلامت قلبی‌متابولیک در میان زنان جوان اقلیت جنسی: شواهدی از یک کوهورت مبتنی بر جمعیت

Kate E. Keenan; Stephanie D. Stepp; Alida Bouris; Alicia K. Matthews; KRISTEN WROBLEWSKI PLoS ONE, 2026, Vol. 21, Issue 10, pp. e0358185 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0358185

چکیده

Purpose We compared objective measures of cardiometabolic health (CMH) between women who identify as lesbian/gay or bisexual (LGB) and women who identify as heterosexual. In addition, we aimed to test whether group differences in stress reactivity partially explained disparities in CMH health. Methods Participants from a longitudinal study were identified for enrollment in 2017. The LGB group self-identified as LGB in 2017 (n = 239), and the heterosexual group identified as straight or heterosexual in each year that sexual identity was asked (study years 2010–2017) (n = 160). CMH was assessed via measurements and biomarkers, and stress reactivity via heart rate variability and cortisol levels during a social stress test. Participants also provided self-reports of stress and health. We tested group differences using sexual identity at Study Year 17, at the time of the visit, and as a proportion of years identifying as LGB. Results Group differences were tested using t-tests for continuous measures, logistic regression for dichotomous measures, and repeated-measures ANOVA for change over time. There were no significant differences in measures of CMH or stress reactivity by sexual identity group. LGB participants had worse self-reported health and higher levels of stress compared to heterosexual participants. Conclusion We discuss several frameworks for interpreting the present results of no differences in objective markers of health in the context of the existing literature, including developmental, socio-political, and methodological frameworks, and suggest directions for research to link the previous research with the results of the current study.

هدف: ما شاخص‌های عینی سلامت قلبی‌متابولیک (CMH) را میان زنانی که خود را به عنوان لGB (همجنس‌گرا/دوجنس‌گرا) و زنانی که خود را به عنوان دگرجنس‌گرا معرفی می‌کنند، مقایسه کردیم. علاوه بر این، هدف ما آزمون این بود که آیا تفاوت‌های گروهی در واکنش‌پذیری به استرس تا حدی می‌تواند نابرابری‌های سلامت CMH را توضیح دهد یا خیر. روش‌ها: شرکت‌کنندگان از یک مطالعه طولی برای ثبت‌نام در سال ۲۰۱۷ شناسایی شدند. گروه LGB در سال ۲۰۱۷ خود را به عنوان LGB معرفی کردند (n = 239) و گروه دگرجنس‌گرا در هر سالی که هویت جنسی پرسیده شد (سال‌های مطالعه ۲۰۱۰ تا ۲۰۱۷) خود را به عنوان دگرجنس‌گرا معرفی کردند (n = 160). سلامت CMH از طریق اندازه‌گیری‌ها و نشانگرهای زیستی ارزیابی شد و واکنش‌پذیری به استرس از طریق تغییرپذیری ضربان قلب و سطوح کورتیزول در طول آزمون استرس اجتماعی سنجیده شد. شرکت‌کنندگان همچنین گزارش‌های خوداظهاری از استرس و سلامت ارائه دادند. تفاوت‌های گروهی با استفاده از هویت جنسی در سال هفدهم مطالعه، در زمان مراجعه و به عنوان نسبت سال‌هایی که به عنوان LGB معرفی شده‌اند، آزمون شد. نتایج: تفاوت‌های گروهی با استفاده از آزمون t برای شاخص‌های پیوسته، رگرسیون لجستیک برای شاخص‌های دووجهی و ANOVA با اندازه‌گیری‌های مکرر برای تغییرات در طول زمان آزمون شد. تفاوت معناداری در شاخص‌های سلامت CMH یا واکنش‌پذیری به استرس بر اساس گروه هویت جنسی مشاهده نشد. شرکت‌کنندگان LGB سلامت خوداظهاری ضعیف‌تر و سطوح استرس بالاتری نسبت به شرکت‌کنندگان دگرجنس‌گرا داشتند. نتیجه‌گیری: ما چندین چارچوب برای تفسیر نتایج حاضر مبنی بر عدم تفاوت در شاخص‌های عینی سلامت در زمینه ادبیات موجود، از جمله چارچوب‌های رشدی، اجتماعی-سیاسی و روش‌شناختی را مورد بحث قرار می‌دهیم و جهت‌گیری‌هایی برای پژوهش به منظور پیوند پژوهش‌های پیشین با نتایج مطالعه حاضر پیشنهاد می‌کنیم.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد