فکر بنیانبانک مقالات روان‌شناسی

open-ended tasks

همهٔ آثار این مفهوم در فکر بنیان

КРЕАТИВНІ ПСИХОЛОГО-ПЕДАГОГІЧНІ ТЕХНОЛОГІЇ У ВИКЛАДАННІ ФАХОВИХ МЕТОДИК ПРИРОДНИЧИХ ДИСЦИПЛІН: ТЕОРЕТИКО-МЕТОДИЧНІ ЗАСАДИ

Mariia Kuzma-Kachur; Vasyl V. Leta Education Innovation Practice, 2026, Vol. 14, Issue 8, pp. 105-114 https://doi.org/10.31110/2616-650x-vol14i8-013

چکیده

The article provides a theoretical and methodological rationale for the use of creative psychological and pedagogical technologies in teaching subject-specific methodologies of natural science disciplines in higher education. The relevance of the study is determined by the need to shift from the acquisition of reproductive knowledge to productive, inquiry-oriented, and professionally focused learning activities in the training of prospective teachers in natural science disciplines. Such activities enable students to generate ideas, formulate and test hypotheses, model natural processes, make methodologically grounded decisions, and create educational products. The aim of the article is to clarify the concept of creative psychological and pedagogical technologies, identify the features that determine their creative orientation, and substantiate the principles, conditions, and criteria for their selection and implementation in the professional training of prospective teachers of natural science disciplines. The study is theoretical and analytical in nature. The source base comprises regulatory documents, research articles, and methodological publications addressing the development of creativity, inquiry- and problem-based learning, teacher education in natural science disciplines, and the use of project-based, digital, and geoinformation tools. Analysis and synthesis, comparison, generalization, systematization, classification, pedagogical modeling, and methodological extrapolation were employed. Creative psychological and pedagogical technologies are understood as pedagogical technologies whose organization creates conditions for productive creative activity through openness to problems, variability of possible solutions, independent generation and verification of ideas, and the creation of a result that is new to the learner. Their implementation in natural science teacher education requires combining originality and variability with scientific validity, evidence-based reasoning, and verifiability. The methodological tools were systematized according to their functional purposes, distinguishing pedagogical technologies, methods, and types of activity, educational approaches, and digital tools. Psychological and pedagogical conditions and criteria for their selection were identified. The theoretical analysis provides grounds for considering problem- and inquiry-based learning, project-based learning, case-based learning, design thinking, modeling, open-ended tasks, geoinformation services, and virtual laboratories as promising tools for organizing creatively oriented learning activities of prospective teachers of natural science disciplines. Their appropriate integration may potentially contribute to the development of creative, critical, and systemic thinking, inquiry skills, and the ability to apply knowledge in non-standard educational and professional situations; however, these effects require further empirical verification. The findings may be used to develop educational programs and instructional materials for the professional training of prospective teachers in natural science disciplines.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد

The effects of ICAP learning activities on learning outcomes

تأثیر فعالیت‌های یادگیری ICAP بر پیامدهای یادگیری

Christina Wekerle; Michael Sailer; Ingo Kollar; Tim Fütterer Learning and Instruction, 2026, Vol. 107, pp. 102482 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102482

چکیده

Background The Interactive-Constructive-Active-Passive (ICAP) framework makes assumptions about the relationships between observable types of learning activities (passive, active, constructive, interactive), cognitive processes, and learning outcomes. Yet, rigorous empirical studies are still lacking establishing the validity of the ICAP framework. Aims This study investigates the effects of student engagement in passive, active, constructive and interactive learning activities on their surface and deep knowledge gain, and their motivation. Additionally, the study aims to determine the associations between students’ cognitive processes, their learning activities, as well as surface and deep knowledge gain. Sample Participants were 249 pre-service teachers. Methods After reading a text on multimedia learning, participants were asked to reread the text (passive condition), to underline central information in the text (active condition), to work on three open-ended tasks addressing the text (constructive condition), or to work on the same tasks in pairs (interactive condition). Results No statistically significant effects of condition on surface or deep knowledge could be detected. Regarding motivation, participants in the interactive condition reported statistically significantly higher levels of perceived relatedness compared to all other conditions. Furthermore, only participants in the interactive condition reported statistically significantly higher levels of interactive cognitive processes compared to those in all other conditions. Constructive cognitive processes were statistically significantly negatively associated with deep knowledge gain. Conclusion The findings suggest that the empirical foundation supporting the ICAP framework may not yet be sufficiently robust. Yet, more research is needed that applies a more rigorous methodology exploring the ICAP framework.

زمینه: چارچوب تعاملی-سازنده-فعال-منفعل (ICAP) فرضیاتی را درباره روابط میان انواع قابل مشاهده فعالیت‌های یادگیری (منفعل، فعال، سازنده، تعاملی)، فرایندهای شناختی و پیامدهای یادگیری مطرح می‌کند. با این حال، مطالعات تجربی دقیق که روایی چارچوب ICAP را اثبات کنند، هنوز وجود ندارند. اهداف: این مطالعه تأثیر مشارکت دانشجویان در فعالیت‌های یادگیری منفعل، فعال، سازنده و تعاملی را بر کسب دانش سطحی و عمقی و انگیزش آن‌ها بررسی می‌کند. همچنین، هدف مطالعه تعیین روابط میان فرایندهای شناختی دانشجویان، فعالیت‌های یادگیری آن‌ها و نیز کسب دانش سطحی و عمقی است. نمونه: شرکت‌کنندگان شامل ۲۴۹ معلم پیش‌خدمت بودند. روش‌ها: پس از مطالعه متنی درباره یادگیری چندرسانه‌ای، از شرکت‌کنندگان خواسته شد متن را مجدداً مطالعه کنند (شرایط منفعل)، اطلاعات مرکزی متن را خط بکشند (شرایط فعال)، به سه پرسش بازپاسخ مرتبط با متن پاسخ دهند (شرایط سازنده)، یا همین وظایف را به صورت دو نفره انجام دهند (شرایط تعاملی). نتایج: هیچ اثر معنادار آماری از شرایط بر دانش سطحی یا عمقی مشاهده نشد. در خصوص انگیزش، شرکت‌کنندگان در شرایط تعاملی سطوح معنادار آماری بالاتری از احساس ارتباط را نسبت به سایر شرایط گزارش کردند. همچنین، تنها شرکت‌کنندگان در شرایط تعاملی سطوح معنادار آماری بالاتری از فرایندهای شناختی تعاملی را نسبت به سایر شرایط گزارش کردند. فرایندهای شناختی سازنده با کسب دانش عمقی رابطه منفی معنادار آماری داشتند. نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که پایه تجربی حمایت‌کننده از چارچوب ICAP هنوز به اندازه کافی قوی نیست. با این حال، پژوهش‌های بیشتری با روش‌شناسی دقیق‌تر برای بررسی چارچوب ICAP مورد نیاز است.

سایت ناشر ↗ دسترسی آزاد