روان‌شناسی شخصیت

The present study aimed at examining relationship between sociotropy and autonomy with self-esteem and anxiety in adults in Pakistan and to test the moderation effect of perceived social support in the relationships between sociotropy and autonomy with self-esteem and anxiety. Methods: A quantitative correlational design was used. The sample consisted of 500 healthy unmarried individuals aged 18-29 years who were selected from government and private universities across the country, using a purposive sampling technique. The Personal Style Inventory, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the anxiety subscale of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 were all filled out by the participants. Data were processed in SPSS version 26, descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlation, Hayes' PROCESS Macro Model 1 and internal consistency analysis were used. Results: There was a significant correlation between sociotropy and anxiety (r=.22, p<.01) and with perceived social support (r=.29, p<.01), but not with self-esteem (r=-.05, p=.267). Self-esteem (r=.15, p<.01), anxiety (r=.12, p<.01) and perceived social support (r=.20, p<.01) were positively related to autonomy. Perceived social support was shown to be significantly positively related to self-esteem (r=.14, p<.01) and, surprisingly, not significantly related to anxiety (r≈0, p=.977). Sociotropy × perceived social support interactions were significant for self-esteem (B=.002, p=.026) and anxiety (B=.001, p=.010), but the autonomy × perceived social support interactions were not significant for self-esteem (B≈0, p=.750) or anxiety (B≈0, p=.569). Conclusion: The results suggest that the sociotropic orientation is related to higher anxiety and that perceived social support modifies the relationship between sociotropy and self-esteem and anxiety. A positive relationship was found between autonomy and self-esteem and autonomy and anxiety; and perceived social support did not significantly change these relationships. These findings underline the need for taking both vulnerability and inter-personal resources into account to comprehend anxiety in young adults in Pakistan.

The effectiveness of young football players’ athletic training is determined by the interaction of physical, technical, tactical, theoretical, integrated, and psychological components. In team sports, communicative and organizational inclinations are of particular importance as psychological prerequisites for effective interaction and the realization of leadership potential. Purpose. To identify and compare the age-related characteristics of communicative and organizational inclinations in young football players and to determine their role in the implementation of leadership functions in team activities. Materials and methods. To achieve the aim of the study, an analysis was conducted analysis of scientific and methodological literature, comparison, psychological assessment using the «Assessment of Communicative and Organizational Inclinations» by V. V. Sinyavskyi and B. O. Fedorishyn, and methods of mathematical statistics, including the Kruskal–Wallis test. The study involved three groups of football players (n=108): aged 9–10 (n=33), 13–14 (n=37), and 16–17 years (n=38) from Children and Youth Sports Schools in Kyiv.Results. Significant individual variability in the indicators was established. Communicative inclinations were found to be more developed than organizational inclinations. Their mean values were 3.00±1.58, 2.92±1.40, and 3.21±1.45 points, respectively, across the three age groups, while organizational inclinations were 2.03±1.33, 2.24±1.42, and 2.34±1.38 points. The oldest group demonstrated a higher proportion of athletes with high and very high levels of communicative inclinations, whereas a low level predominated in organizational inclinations across all age groups. No statistically significant age-related differences were found in communicative (H=0.75; p=0.69) or organizational inclinations (H=1.11; p=0.57). Conclusions. Communicative and organizational inclinations are important psychological prerequisites, but not direct indicators, of leadership function implementation. The communicative component creates prerequisites for information, motivational, mediating, and representative functions, while the organizational component contributes to planning, coordination, and responsibility-taking. The findings support the need for targeted development of these characteristics and the application of distributed leadership principles.

Abstract The concepts of archetypes and the collective unconscious are the most recognised among Carl G. Jung’s contributions. The collective unconscious is a component of the human psyche distinct from the personal unconscious and not derived from individual experience; therefore, it does not constitute a personal realization. Jung’s theory centres on the Collective Unconscious, which he defines as a repository of “racial memories,” primal images, and experiential patterns known as archetypes. Jungian literary criticism sharply contrasts with psychoanalytic criticism. Although he initially followed Sigmund Freud, Jung’s interpretation of depth psychology diverges significantly from that of his predecessor, creating a fundamental difference between Jungian literary criticism and psychoanalytic criticism. The purpose of this paper is to apply Jung’s theory, “Archetypes and The Collective Unconscious,” to the characters in J. C. Oates’s short story “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?” by analysing the archetypes of persona, anima/animus, shadow, and the self within the story to understand how these archetypes interact to shape the psyche of each character and their psychological behaviours throughout the story. Keywords: Collective Unconscious, Personal Unconscious, Archetypes, Persona, Anima/Animus, Shadow, Self, Psychoanalytic Criticism, Psychological Behaviours, Dreams and Visions

In 2019, Paul B. Preciado stood before three and a half thousand members of the École de la Cause Freudienneand declared: ‘I am the monster that speaks to you’. The divided reactioncrystallised a paradox: a discipline devoted to listening responded with refusal. This article takes that moment to develop two concepts in social theory: strategic certainties, the practices through which institutions transform interpretive heuristics into ontological verdicts, immunizing their frameworks against challenge; and epistemic habitus, the patterned dispositions through which such certainties are reproduced and transmitted. Lacanian institutionalisationand its pathologisation of trans experience as psychotic structure constitute a limit case of this mechanism, analytically privileged on four grounds. Trans experience challenges Lacanian sexuation at its core; the trans-psychosis association is exceptionally stable; the passage from heuristic to ontology is unusually visible; and the trans subject speaks, entering the space of classification to contest it from within. Against these closures, the article proposes radical reflexivity, the dispositionto hold one's own categories open in the encounter with what they cannot yet name. The monsters were never in those who spoke, but in the certainties that imagined them.

در سال ۲۰۱۹، Paul B. Preciado در برابر سه هزار و پانصد نفر از اعضای École de la Cause Freudienne ایستاد و اعلام کرد: «من هیولایی هستم که با شما سخن می‌گوید». واکنش دوپاره به این سخن، پارادوکسی را برجسته ساخت: رشته‌ای که خود را وقف شنیدن کرده است، با امتناع پاسخ داد. این مقاله با تکیه بر آن لحظه، دو مفهوم در نظریه اجتماعی را بسط می‌دهد: قطعیت‌های راهبردی، شیوه‌هایی که از طریق آن‌ها نهادها، راهبردهای تفسیر را به احکام وجودشناختی بدل می‌کنند و چارچوب‌های خود را در برابر چالش مصون می‌سازند؛ و عادت‌واره معرفتی، گرایش‌های الگومندی که از طریق آن‌ها این قطعیت‌ها بازتولید و منتقل می‌شوند. نهادینه‌سازی لاکانی و آسیب‌شناسی تجربه ترنس به‌عنوان ساختار روان‌پریشانه، نمونه حدی این سازوکار است که از چهار جهت تحلیل‌پذیر است: تجربه ترنس، هسته جنسیت‌یابی لاکانی را به چالش می‌کشد؛ پیوند ترنس-روان‌پریشی به‌طرز استثنایی باثبات است؛ گذار از راهبرد تفسیر به وجودشناسی به‌طرز غیرمعمولی آشکار است؛ و سوژه ترنس سخن می‌گوید و وارد فضای طبقه‌بندی می‌شود تا آن را از درون به چالش بکشد. در برابر این بسته‌شدگی‌ها، مقاله بازاندیشی رادیکال را پیشنهاد می‌کند؛ گرایشی برای گشودن دسته‌بندی‌های خود در مواجهه با آنچه هنوز نام‌ناپذیر است. هیولاها هرگز در کسانی که سخن گفتند نبودند، بلکه در قطعیت‌هایی بودند که آن‌ها را تصور کردند.

Understanding how personal values shape preference formation is a central concern in personality and social psychology, and increasingly relevant to tourism research. This study examines how openness to change (self-direction, stimulation, and hedonism) and conservation values (conformity, tradition, and security) are associated with preferences for novelty and familiarity in vacation experiences. Unlike prior variable-centered studies, this research adopts a person-centered approach to identify profiles based on within-person value structures. Using latent profile analysis on data from 498 US tourists, we identified four distinct value profiles: Tradition-focused, Stimulation-focused, Strong, and Weak. The Tradition-focused profile aligns with conservation values, favoring familiar experiences, while the Stimulation-focused profile, aligned with openness to change, favors novel experiences. The Strong profile places high importance on both openness to change and conservation values, showing the most balanced preference for new and familiar elements among the four profiles. The Weak profile places low importance on all values, reflecting flexible vacation preferences. These findings challenge the traditional dichotomy of novelty and familiarity, demonstrating that individuals can simultaneously hold preferences for both. By showing that openness to change and conservation values can be jointly important within individuals, this study extends the theoretical understanding of compatible and conflicting values and contributes to person-centered research on individual differences. Applied to tourism, these insights offer practical implications for tailoring vacation experiences to diverse value profiles.

درک چگونگی تأثیر ارزش‌های فردی بر شکل‌گیری ترجیحات، یکی از دغدغه‌های اصلی در روان‌شناسی شخصیت و اجتماعی است و به طور فزاینده‌ای در پژوهش‌های گردشگری اهمیت یافته است. این مطالعه بررسی می‌کند که چگونه ارزش‌های گشودگی نسبت به تغییر (خودراهبری، تحریک و لذت‌گرایی) و ارزش‌های حفظ (همنوایی، سنت و امنیت) با ترجیحات برای نوآوری و آشنایی در تجارب تعطیلات مرتبط هستند. برخلاف مطالعات پیشین با رویکرد متغیرمحور، این پژوهش رویکرد فردمحور را اتخاذ کرده است تا با تحلیل ساختارهای ارزشی درون‌فردی، پروفایل‌هایی را شناسایی کند. با استفاده از تحلیل پروفایل نهفته بر داده‌های ۴۹۸ گردشگر آمریکایی، چهار پروفایل ارزشی متمایز شناسایی شد: تمرکز بر سنت، تمرکز بر تحریک، قوی و ضعیف. پروفایل تمرکز بر سنت با ارزش‌های حفظ همسو بوده و تجارب آشنا را ترجیح می‌دهد، در حالی که پروفایل تمرکز بر تحریک که با گشودگی نسبت به تغییر همراستا است، تجارب نو را ترجیح می‌دهد. پروفایل قوی، هم به ارزش‌های گشودگی نسبت به تغییر و هم به ارزش‌های حفظ اهمیت بالایی می‌دهد و متعادل‌ترین ترجیح را برای عناصر جدید و آشنا در میان چهار پروفایل نشان می‌دهد. پروفایل ضعیف اهمیت اندکی برای همه ارزش‌ها قائل است و ترجیحات تعطیلاتی انعطاف‌پذیر را منعکس می‌کند. این یافته‌ها دوگانگی سنتی نوآوری و آشنایی را به چالش می‌کشد و نشان می‌دهد که افراد می‌توانند همزمان ترجیحاتی برای هر دو داشته باشند. با نشان دادن اینکه ارزش‌های گشودگی نسبت به تغییر و حفظ می‌توانند به طور مشترک درون افراد اهمیت داشته باشند، این مطالعه فهم نظری از ارزش‌های سازگار و متعارض را گسترش داده و به پژوهش‌های فردمحور درباره تفاوت‌های فردی کمک می‌کند. در کاربرد گردشگری، این بینش‌ها پیامدهای عملی برای متناسب‌سازی تجارب تعطیلات با پروفایل‌های ارزشی متنوع ارائه می‌دهد.