فکر بنیانبانک مقالات روان‌شناسی
دسترسی آزاد پژوهشی داوری‌شده انگلیسی

Measuring Successful Cooperation in Human-AI Teamwork: Development and Validation of the Perceived Cooperativity and Teaming Perception Scales

سنجش همکاری موفق در کار تیمی انسان‌-هوش مصنوعی: توسعه و روایی مقیاس‌های ادراک همکاری و ادراک تیمی

Christiane Attig, Christiane B. Wiebel-Herboth, Patricia Wollstadt, Tim Schrills, Mourad Zoubir, Thomas Franke

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 2026, pp. 1-32
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2026.2739657

ورود برای خواندن متن کاملبرای خواندن متن کامل وارد حساب فکر بنیان شوید.

چکیده

As human–AI cooperation becomes increasingly prevalent, reliable instruments for assessing the subjective quality of cooperative human–AI interaction are needed. We introduce two theoretically grounded scales: the Perceived Cooperativity Scale (PCS), grounded in joint activity theory, and the Teaming Perception Scale (TPS), grounded in evolutionary cooperation theory. The PCS captures an agent’s perceived cooperative capability and practice within a single interaction sequence; the TPS captures the emergent sense of teaming arising from mutual contribution and support. Both scales were adapted for human–human cooperation to enable cross-agent comparisons. Across three studies (complete N=409) encompassing a cooperative card game (N1=94), LLM interaction (N2=182), and a decision-support system (N3=133), analyses of dimensionality, reliability, and validity indicated that both scales successfully differentiated between cooperation partners of varying cooperative quality and showed construct validity in line with expectations. The scales provide a basis for empirical investigation and system evaluation across a wide range of human–AI cooperation contexts.

چکیده به فارسی

با گسترش روزافزون همکاری انسان‌-هوش مصنوعی، ابزارهای قابل اعتماد برای سنجش کیفیت ذهنی تعاملات تعاونی انسان‌-هوش مصنوعی مورد نیاز است. ما دو مقیاس نظریه‌محور معرفی می‌کنیم: مقیاس ادراک همکاری (PCS) مبتنی بر نظریه فعالیت مشترک و مقیاس ادراک تیمی (TPS) مبتنی بر نظریه تکاملی همکاری. PCS توانمندی و عملکرد تعاونی ادراک‌شده یک عامل را در یک توالی تعامل منفرد اندازه‌گیری می‌کند؛ TPS حس پدیداری تیمی ناشی از مشارکت و حمایت متقابل را می‌سنجد. هر دو مقیاس برای همکاری انسان‌-انسان نیز تطبیق داده شده‌اند تا امکان مقایسه بین عامل‌ها فراهم شود. در سه مطالعه (کل N=409) شامل یک بازی کارتی تعاونی (N1=94)، تعامل با LLM (N2=182) و یک سامانه پشتیبان تصمیم‌گیری (N3=133)، تحلیل‌های ابعادی، پایایی و روایی نشان داد که هر دو مقیاس به طور موفقیت‌آمیزی میان شرکای همکاری با کیفیت تعاونی متفاوت تمایز قائل می‌شوند و روایی سازه‌ای مطابق با انتظارات را نشان می‌دهند. این مقیاس‌ها مبنایی برای پژوهش‌های تجربی و ارزیابی سامانه‌ها در طیف وسیعی از زمینه‌های همکاری انسان‌-هوش مصنوعی فراهم می‌کنند.

ترجمه‌ی خودکار برای آشنایی سریع؛ برای نقل و ارجاع، متن اصلی ملاک است.

موضوع‌ها و کلیدواژه‌ها

ادراکهوشConstruct validityDecision support systemcooperationhuman-AI teamingscale development

ارجاع

Attig, C., Wiebel-Herboth, C. B., Wollstadt, P., Schrills, T., Zoubir, M., & Franke, T. (2026). Measuring Successful Cooperation in Human-AI Teamwork: Development and Validation of the Perceived Cooperativity and Teaming Perception Scales. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2026.2739657

(Attig et al., 2026)

دانلود BibTeX · دانلود RIS

گفت‌وگو

قوانین پرسش و گفتگو
  1. با احترام و بدون توهین، تحقیر، برچسب‌زنی یا حمله‌ی شخصی با دیگران گفتگو کنید.
  2. از نوشتن هرگونه اطلاعات هویتی یا قابل‌شناسایی مراجعان، بیماران یا اشخاص ثالث، از جمله نام، شماره‌ی تماس، تصویر، نشانی، محل کار یا جزئیات منحصربه‌فرد پرونده خودداری کنید.
  3. اگر درباره‌ی یک تجربه‌ی بالینی سؤال می‌کنید، اطلاعات را تا حد ممکن بی‌نام و کلی بیان کنید تا امکان شناسایی فرد وجود نداشته باشد.
  4. این بخش برای یادگیری و گفت‌وگوی علمی است و جایگزین ارزیابی، تشخیص، مشاوره یا روان‌درمانی شخصی نیست.
  5. در شرایط بحران یا خطر آسیب به خود یا دیگران، به این بخش اتکا نکنید و برای دریافت کمک فوری با اورژانس اجتماعی ۱۲۳ یا صدای مشاور بهزیستی ۱۴۸۰ تماس بگیرید.
  6. انتشار تبلیغات، معرفی خدمات شخصی، شماره‌ی تلفن، شناسه‌ی شبکه‌های اجتماعی، پیوند تبلیغاتی یا درخواست جذب مراجع در این بخش مجاز نیست.
  7. در بیان ادعاهای علمی، به‌ویژه درباره‌ی اثربخشی درمان‌ها، تشخیص یا یافته‌های پژوهشی، تا حد امکان نام منبع معتبر، مقاله یا راهنمای علمی را ذکر کنید.
  8. از ارائه‌ی تشخیص قطعی، تجویز درمان یا دارو و توصیه‌های بالینی شخصی به سایر کاربران خودداری کنید.
  9. پاسخ‌هایی که کارشناسان فکر بنیان می‌دهند با برچسب «پاسخ فکر بنیان» یا «کارشناس فکر بنیان» نمایش داده می‌شوند و سایر نوشته‌ها بیانگر نظر کاربران هستند.
  10. گزارش نوشته‌ی نامناسب: اگر نوشته‌ای حاوی نقض محرمانگی، محتوای آسیب‌زا، توهین، تبلیغ یا تخلف از این قوانین است، گزینه‌ی «گزارش» را انتخاب کنید تا تیم سایت بررسی کند.

برای پرسیدن و پاسخ دادن باید مشترک باشید. ورود

هنوز پرسشی منتشر نشده است.

مقاله‌های مرتبط

Relevansi Nilai-Nilai Peradaban Islam dalam Pengembangan Pendidikan Modern di Era Digital

Arifah Khoirunnisaa; Lisan Nulhasanah Tadabbur Jurnal Peradaban Islam, 2026, Vol. 8, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.22373/tadabbur.v8i2.1090

چکیده

Islamic civilization is one of the major civilizations that has significantly contributed to the development of science and education worldwide. During its golden age, it established educational institutions, fostered scholarly traditions, and produced influential scholars whose ideas continue to shape modern knowledge in the digital era. This article examines the relevance of Islamic civilizational values to the development of modern education through qualitative library research using thematic content analysis. The findings show that Islamic education was distinguished by four interrelated values, namely a strong culture of literacy, the integration of religious and general knowledge, an emphasis on moral formation (akhlak), and openness to knowledge from other civilizations, which together enabled scholars to advance science while upholding ethical and social responsibility. These values are highly relevant to addressing contemporary educational challenges, including declining critical literacy, uncritical dependence on digital technology and artificial intelligence, and the ongoing crisis of learners’ character. These values can inform the development of a modern educational system that integrates critical thinking, digital literacy, character education, and lifelong learning while maintaining moral and social responsibility.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد

Leadership Qualities and Practices for Effective Leadership: Evidence from Africa Renewal University, Uganda

Richard Drabe Aguta Journal of Economics Finance and Management Studies, 2026, Vol. 09, Issue 10, pp. 5738-5746 https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v9-i10-48

چکیده

Effective leadership is important to the functioning and development of private higher education institutions. This study analyzed leadership experiences and perceptions at Africa Renewal University (AfRU), focusing on the qualities and practices perceived to contribute to effective leadership. A mixed-method case study design was used, combining structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with students, teaching staff, non-teaching staff, management and senior leaders. The study obtained responses from 133 participants out of a target population of 200, representing a 66.5% response rate. Transformational leadership was the most frequently identified leadership style across all respondent groups, reported by 86.96% of students, 77.5% of teaching staff, 66.67% of non-teaching staff, and 70% of management and senior leaders. Among the leadership qualities examined, integrity and ethics received the highest number of responses, followed by effective communication, problem-solving and decision-making. Empathy and emotional intelligence and visionary thinking were also identified, although their emphasis varied across respondent groups. The findings indicate that perceived leadership effectiveness at AfRU was associated with a combination of ethical conduct, effective communication and practical leadership capabilities within a predominantly transformational leadership context. The study highlights the importance of developing leaders who can combine ethical character with effective communication, decision-making and problem-solving in private higher education.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد

ADAPTAÇÃO E VALIDAÇÃO DE UM INSTRUMENTO DE PERCEPÇÃO DE POLÍTICAS E PRÁTICAS DE GESTÃO PARA PROFESSORES DO ENSINO SUPERIOR

Marcelle Rossi de Mello Brandão; Daniela Rodrigues Carreira; Maria Geralda de Miranda; Alex Pires Andrade; Carla Galego; Rosa Maria de Deus de Sousa Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e Educação, 2026, Vol. 12, Issue 10, pp. 1-14 https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v12i10.30703

چکیده

This article sought to adapt and validate an instrument for the perception of management policies and practices aimed at higher education professors, since the available instruments were designed for organisations in general and do not address the particularities of academic work. The instrument was based on two scales already validated for Brazilian organisations, with the addition of items on research incentives, publication support and the teaching career. Content and criterion validity derived from the published origin of the items, complemented by prior definition of the constructs, peer review and pre-testing. A total of 386 professors from Brazilian public and private institutions took part, answering on an interval scale based on adverbs of quantity and frequency. Internal consistency reached a Cronbach's alpha of 0.956. Exploratory factor analysis, used for the statistical validation of the constructs defined a priori, retained six factors explaining 67.3% of the accumulated variance, with a sampling adequacy of 0.948. The expected dimensions were reproduced, and the added items formed a factor of their own. It is concluded that the adapted instrument is suitable for measuring teachers' perception of institutional management.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد

Resolving the apparent paradox of multisensory expertise: coupling priors, common-cause priors, and how to distinguish among them

Alessandro Bortolotti; Riccardo Palumbo; Fabio Lokwani-Di Matteo; Pier Luigi Sacco Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2026, Vol. 20, pp. 1960361 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1960361

چکیده

Perceptual expertise is widely assumed to refine multisensory perception, yet the empirical literature appears inconsistent. Trained musicians show narrower audiovisual temporal integration windows and quicker segregation, whereas experienced wine tasters seem more influenced by a wine's color in their aroma and flavor judgments than novices are. We argue that the inconsistency arises from a conflation of two formally distinct quantities: the prior probability that concurrent signals arise from a common source, and the coupling between the values of signals that share one. We present a generative model in which both are free parameters, along with channel precision and a decision criterion, that contains causal-inference and coupling-prior models as special cases. The model shows that the correlation between the values of two signals across an environment reflects only the product of the two priors, so that a correlation-tracking learner acquires the coupling when the signals always share a source, whereas separating the two priors requires representing causal structure; that binary common-source reports confound the common-cause prior with the decision criterion; that the coupling trades off against the measurement noise of the influencing channel unless its precision is measured independently; and that the two priors leave distinct signatures in how cross-modal influence varies with disparity. When the source is fixed, as for the color and odor of a wine, tighter coupling alone produces the conjunction of greater displacement by color and better discrimination between wines reported for experienced tasters, which no change in odor precision can produce. Simulations of a test battery combining continuous estimates, common-source reports and discrimination thresholds show that the parameters can be recovered, that a within-subject dissociation can be detected with conventional sample sizes under illustrative effect sizes, and that recovery fails in certain cases. The account yields a rule classifying environments by their base rate of common causation and their coupling strength, and the same ambiguity attends claims about altered multisensory processing in autism and aging. We also show that the most cited demonstration of expert susceptibility to color contains no expertise manipulation, and suggest that apparent expert biases may reflectwind calibration to real-world statistics.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد

Continuous cursor tracking as a process-oriented measure of anticipation in soccer: expertise differences in spatial and temporal preparation

Osamu Nakamura; Ryoji Onagawa; Kazutoshi Kudo; Norikazu Hirose Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2026, Vol. 8, pp. 1991767 https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2026.1991767

چکیده

Introduction Anticipating an opponent's actions is central to performance in team sports such as soccer, where a player must select the correct response within a fraction of a second. Perceptual-cognitive expertise in anticipation is well documented, but standard measures (response time, accuracy, or option choice) capture only the discrete response produced at a single moment and leave the preparatory processing that precedes it unobserved. Building on evidence that hand and cursor movements reveal cognition as it unfolds, the present study examined, as a proof of concept, whether continuous cursor tracking can read out the pre-response preparatory state in a sports anticipation task. Methods Twelve skilled soccer players and twelve novices watched soccer pass-course clips and anticipated which teammate would receive the ball by moving a cursor; the video was stopped at the final frame (the moment a response was required), and the same clips were repeated across three blocks. Two continuous measures were defined: the cursor's Euclidean distance to the correct receiver at response onset (a spatial index of where the participant was poised) and the increase in cursor velocity in the window immediately before response onset (a temporal index of the movement toward the response). Results Compared with novices, skilled players anticipated more accurately, were poised closer to the correct receiver, and showed a larger velocity increase; control analyses argued against the velocity difference being a by-product of the total amount of movement. In an exploratory analysis, the positional difference emerged across repeated presentations of the same clips and was largest in the final block. In addition, the velocity difference was already present in the first presentation, and no significant change across repeated presentations was detected. Discussion The pre-response preparatory state is observed in both a spatial aspect (where one is poised) and a temporal aspect (how one moves toward the response). Because in basic reaching research the position and the velocity of movement index different aspects of decision-making, capturing both under a single continuous measure (which discrete responses cannot) provides a basis for measuring the decision-making processes that underlie anticipation in sport.

متن کامل دسترسی آزاد